* M. Warner Losh (i...@bsdimp.com) wrote:
> I don't think that GPLv2 section 3c applies because we've not received
> an section 3b offer to redistribute. Instead, the RPMs are provided
> under section 3a. The FSF made a big deal about this not being
> sufficient a while ago.
Oh, after reading i
In message: <20090605133321.ga18...@hades.panopticon>
Dmitry Marakasov writes:
: Hi!
:
: I have concerns with linux ports fetching source RPMs when
: PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined. As I understand, that is done to comply
: with GPL, however GPL does not strictly require mirroring source
Hi!
I have concerns with linux ports fetching source RPMs when
PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined. As I understand, that is done to comply
with GPL, however GPL does not strictly require mirroring sources,
and just a not on where t get them would suffice. Here's forward
of message with details.
- Fo
