Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-13 Thread Krutov Mikle
this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4896214.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-13 Thread Jakub Lach
in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4898252.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-13 Thread Krutov Mikle
Ah, Pearson! Whoops :( Hope he'll not get mad of me for misspelling his name if he sees it :) Well, there are even more interesting ideas. http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3095 That at least seems fun. For me. But not usefull at all, yes. PS. Porting to Qt4? Stalled due

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-12 Thread Krutov Mikle
Hello, -- Hi list! Judging from latest commits, KDE3 moved swiftly from stall, but usable to explicitly Im very interested in supporting KDE3 to live on FreeBSD But have a lack of any programming experience and so, so just Im scared of it. If anyone could take a lead or something, I will

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-12 Thread Jakub Lach
... I do not like the idea of Preston to rewrite KDE3 to Qt4 (see no profits so on). Where that idea came from? Is it Preston Brown's? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4896214.html Sent from the freebsd-ports

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I'm as well a happy user of KDE3 in all my laptops and even my small EeePC 900 netbook. I don't want to miss this, because I think KDE4 is hunting in wrong directions from the point of view of the end user. While this is a personal opinion, it turned out that KDE4 just did not work. I

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-11 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
09.10.2011, 22:30, Jakub Lach: Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is not that light after all. Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3?? -- Regards, Konstantin ___

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-11 Thread Michal Varga
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 16:32 +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 09.10.2011, 22:30, Jakub Lach: Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is not that light after all. Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3?? Especially when

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-11 Thread Jakub Lach
Well, Brendan Fabeny fixed qt33 and affected kde bits. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4892915.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com

KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-09 Thread Jakub Lach
-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885362.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-09 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 07:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote: Hello, Judging from latest commits, KDE3 moved swiftly from stall, but usable to explicitly unsupported. However, there are still areas, where KDE3 can't be replaced by newer version. (e.g. I

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

2011-10-09 Thread Jakub Lach
or mcwm, but it bears none relevance whatsoever. KDE3 was nice in that DE which is not yet completely blown-out-of-proportions way :) Thanks for attention. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885908.html Sent from