this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4896214.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4898252.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Ah, Pearson!
Whoops :(
Hope he'll not get mad of me for misspelling his name if he sees it :)
Well, there are even more interesting
ideas.
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3095
That at least seems fun. For me.
But not usefull at all, yes.
PS. Porting to Qt4?
Stalled due
Hello,
--
Hi list!
Judging from latest commits, KDE3 moved
swiftly from stall, but usable to explicitly
Im very interested in supporting KDE3 to live on FreeBSD
But have a lack of any programming experience and so,
so just Im scared of it. If anyone could take a lead or
something, I will
...
I do not like the idea of Preston to
rewrite KDE3 to Qt4 (see no profits so on).
Where that idea came from?
Is it Preston Brown's?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4896214.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports
Hello,
I'm as well a happy user of KDE3 in all my laptops and even my small
EeePC 900 netbook. I don't want to miss this, because I think KDE4 is
hunting in wrong directions from the point of view of the end user.
While this is a personal opinion, it turned out that KDE4 just did not
work. I
09.10.2011, 22:30, Jakub Lach:
Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry
these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is
not that light after all.
Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3??
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 16:32 +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
09.10.2011, 22:30, Jakub Lach:
Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry
these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is
not that light after all.
Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3??
Especially when
Well, Brendan Fabeny fixed qt33 and affected kde bits.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4892915.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885362.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 07:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Hello,
Judging from latest commits, KDE3 moved
swiftly from stall, but usable to explicitly
unsupported.
However, there are still areas, where KDE3
can't be replaced by newer version.
(e.g. I
or mcwm, but it bears
none relevance whatsoever.
KDE3 was nice in that DE which is not yet
completely blown-out-of-proportions way :)
Thanks for attention.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885908.html
Sent from
12 matches
Mail list logo