I think we should consider gradually using the Clear BSD license whenever
someone decides to make an alternate, where a GPL licensed code was inserted on
top of less restrictive licenses.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> 'someone else said something to the effect of "If I looked at the code
> already, the license is already contaminated"'
That makes no sense to me. That advice seems counterproductive. In the source
code, I'm sure you saw this, but there are different licenses in the files.
Usually, when
If the author doesn't respond, it's best to move on. Either use their GPL, or
completely rewrite it, to avoid infringing on their work. It should be in it's
own separate files, so it doesn't get absorbed into that other work's more
restrictive license, before it is its own work. You'll need to
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
wrote:
> [format recovered]
>
> On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 23:31:33 -0800, Chris H wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:24:53 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" <
> gurenc...@gmail.com> said
> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM,
[format recovered]
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 23:31:33 -0800, Chris H wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:24:53 +0800 "blubee blubeeme"
> said
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>>> On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:24:53 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> > I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 12:24:53 +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
>> On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote:
>>> I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like the
>>>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> > I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like the original
> > developer is not and have not done any work on the software sine
On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like the original
> developer is not and have not done any work on the software sine mid 2000.
>
> I'd like to pick up the project, fix bugs BUT i'd like to migrate
I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like the original
developer is not and have not done any work on the software sine mid 2000.
I'd like to pick up the project, fix bugs BUT i'd like to migrate from GPL
to BSD license.
How does one go about doing that? I have seen the GPL code
10 matches
Mail list logo