Ken Williams wrote:
> Interesting - another MakeMaker weirdness I guess?
>
> John: here's a bug report I'm passing along for version.pm, not sure
> what the deal is. On my machine I've confirmed that 'perl Makefile.PL;
> make;' doesn't produce any man pages in blib/ with version.pm 0.652.
>
> -
Interesting - another MakeMaker weirdness I guess?
John: here's a bug report I'm passing along for version.pm, not sure
what the deal is. On my machine I've confirmed that 'perl
Makefile.PL; make;' doesn't produce any man pages in blib/ with
version.pm 0.652.
-Ken
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9
Hi,
I noticed that now p5-version does not install manpages.
I'd try to make a patch for that. Can you investigate that?
Thanks,
--- Makefile.PL.origWed Jul 19 23:22:09 2006
+++ Makefile.PL Thu Jul 20 10:29:00 2006
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
AUTHOR => 'John Peacock
Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I
think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build.
-Ken
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
Hi,
Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-
Hi,
Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on
p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem.
i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but
p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too.
