Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:03:37 -0600, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:42:57 -0800 From: "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:42:57 -0800 > From: "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > > > From: "Thomas Zander"

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > From: "Thomas Zander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 'acodec=aac' worked in the version now in ports, although that version > > failed to write the header with a floating point error. :-( > > Does thi

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:42:57 -0800 > From: "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > > > From: "Thomas Zander"

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-07 Thread Kevin Downey
On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > > From: "Thomas Zander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-07 Thread Kevin Downey
On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > From: "Thomas Zander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 'acodec=aac' worked in the version now in ports, although that version >

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-07 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > From: "Thomas Zander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 'acodec=aac' worked in the version now in ports, although that version > > failed to write the header with a floating point error. :-( > > Does thi

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-07 Thread Thomas Zander
On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'acodec=aac' worked in the version now in ports, although that version > failed to write the header with a floating point error. :-( Does this mean it has never been in a really useful state? Riggs

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-11-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Hi, > > the mplayer developers recently released the 1.0 rc 2 version of their > well known product. > I updated the mplayer and mencoder ports accordingly and attached them > to this mail. > Any feedback/patches are appreciated before I'm going to send-pr this. I built mplayer and mencoder and

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-26 Thread Thomas Zander
On 24/10/2007, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > May I ask you: if the software is at 1.0.rc2, why the port version is > set at 0.99.xx? Because a healthy numbering scheme (as in 'numbers') is more useful for correct version tracking than that ludicrous approach some people are insisting

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-24 Thread Angelo Turetta
Thomas Zander wrote: There it is: http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 May I ask you: if the software is at 1.0.rc2, why the port version is set at 0.99.xx? You might want to make some test on your own, but in my experience using a version like 1.0.r2 is supported by the port s

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-22 Thread Oliver Herold
Yes sorry, my fault. But after cleaning it there is some break again with stream_dvd. Cheers Oliver On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:07:38PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote: > On 22/10/2007, Oliver Herold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > > loader/dmo/DMO_VideoD

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-22 Thread Thomas Zander
On 21/10/2007, Thomas Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 Thank you for all the reports so far. That looks like a ridiculous amount of build errors on various configurarions, much worse than I expected. :-/ I hope to get some of them sorted out a

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-22 Thread Thomas Zander
On 22/10/2007, Oliver Herold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to loader/dmo/DMO_VideoDecoder.c.rej > => Patch patch-DMO_VideoDecoder.c failed to apply cleanly. This patch doesn't exist anymore. Did you clean the mplayer port dir before extracting the tarball?

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Johnson
On 10/21/07, Thomas Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There it is: > > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 on 7.0 cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -O3 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include -I./libavcodec -I./libavformat -Wdisabled-optimization

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Thomas Zander píše v ne 21. 10. 2007 v 22:57 +0800: > There it is: > > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 Does not build: cc -I. -I.. -I../libavutil -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Anish Mistry
On Sunday 21 October 2007, Thomas Zander wrote: > Hi, > > the mplayer developers recently released the 1.0 rc 2 version of > their well known product. > I updated the mplayer and mencoder ports accordingly and attached > them to this mail. > Any feedback/patches are appreciated before I'm going to

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Oliver Herold
Hi didn't have success -clean install - => MPlayer-1.0rc2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://www1.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/. MPlayer-1.0rc2.tar.bz2100% of 9119 kB 114 kBps 00m00s ===> Extracting for

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Wes Morgan
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Thomas Zander wrote: Hi, the mplayer developers recently released the 1.0 rc 2 version of their well known product. I updated the mplayer and mencoder ports accordingly and attached them to this mail. Any feedback/patches are appreciated before I'm going to send-pr this.

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Thomas Zander píše v ne 21. 10. 2007 v 20:00 +0800: > the mplayer developers recently released the 1.0 rc 2 version of their > well known product. > I updated the mplayer and mencoder ports accordingly and attached them > to this mail. > Any feedback/patches are appreciated before I'm going to sen

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Thomas Zander
There it is: http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 Riggs ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

2007-10-21 Thread Thomas Zander
Hi, the mplayer developers recently released the 1.0 rc 2 version of their well known product. I updated the mplayer and mencoder ports accordingly and attached them to this mail. Any feedback/patches are appreciated before I'm going to send-pr this. Riggs