On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 22:07 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:41:06 -0400
> Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:47 -0600, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:41:06 -0400
Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:47 -0600, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > > RW wrote:
> > > > > Both
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:47 -0600, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > RW wrote:
> > > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> > > > java/linux-sun-jdk15
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:59:09PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> > > java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
> > > jdk15 manually
RW wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:07:52 -0700
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> RW wrote:
>>
>>> What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
>>> build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
>> Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the buil
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:49:57 -0400
Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:31 +0100, RW wrote:
>
> > In the normal case, the installed bootstrap of a native jdk is
> > going to be itself, so adding a new dependency is going to be
> > undesirable.
>
> I agree, havi
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:31 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:59:09 -0400
> Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > RW wrote:
> > > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > > > install java/linux-
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:07:52 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
> > build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
>
> Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the build
> and run dep
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:59:09 -0400
Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > > install java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I
> > > upgrade j
RW wrote:
> What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
> build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the build
and run dependencies and handles the compilation and installation
itself. That way you get all of po
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> > java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
> > jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
> >
> > The way the jdk
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:28:53 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > install java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I
> > upgrade jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the
> > tools.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:39:30 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The port now depends on the Diablo JDK, but that exposed BUILD_DEPENDS
> line still brings in the diablo-jdk15 port even if a native JDK is
> already available.
>
> It would be nice to use an installed java/jd
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, RW wrote:
Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade jdk15
manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location o
RW wrote:
> Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
> jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
>
> The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location
> of an existi
Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location
of an existing jdk installation fo
16 matches
Mail list logo
