Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-02-13 Thread Doug Barton
Mark Ovens wrote: If I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch will fix it. Please confirm this for me when you can. That fixed it Doug - thanks for the quick response. Good news, thanks for testing it. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-02-13 Thread Mark Ovens
> If I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch will fix it. > Please confirm this for me when you can. > That fixed it Doug - thanks for the quick response. Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-02-11 Thread Mark Ovens
Doug Barton wrote: Mark Ovens wrote: Doug, it's happened again: It's impossible for me to debug this properly without knowing the command line options you used. I'm guessing from your description of the problem that you used at least -r and -u. I included the command line in my OP - por

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-02-11 Thread Doug Barton
Mark Ovens wrote: Doug, it's happened again: It's impossible for me to debug this properly without knowing the command line options you used. I'm guessing from your description of the problem that you used at least -r and -u. It honoured the +IGNOREME during the recursive ``make config'' bu

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-02-11 Thread Mark Ovens
Doug, it's happened again: [...] ===>>> Updating package dependency entry for each dependent port ===>>> Re-installation of mjpegtools-1.9.0.r3 succeeded ===>>> Returning to check of ports depending on icu-3.8.1 ===>>> Launching child to update mozilla-1.7.13_3,2 icu-3.8.1 >> mozilla-1

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
Mark Ovens wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> I didn't see the first one, so it probably didn't hit the list. >> >> Both of your problems are almost certainly caused by running the old >> version first. Please repeat your -Baud run to make sure that >> portmaster 2.0 is handling +IGNOREME properly (it

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Ovens
Doug Barton wrote: I didn't see the first one, so it probably didn't hit the list. Both of your problems are almost certainly caused by running the old version first. Please repeat your -Baud run to make sure that portmaster 2.0 is handling +IGNOREME properly (it should), and then update apache

Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-01-27 Thread Doug Barton
Mark Ovens wrote: > Apologies if this appears twice, I posted it nearly 24 hours ago and it > hasn't shown up in the list so I'm resending it. I didn't see the first one, so it probably didn't hit the list. Both of your problems are almost certainly caused by running the old version first. Please

Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??

2008-01-27 Thread Mark Ovens
Apologies if this appears twice, I posted it nearly 24 hours ago and it hasn't shown up in the list so I'm resending it. I've got +IGNOREME in /var/db/pkg/mozilla-1.7.13_3,2/ (as it's only required for OpenOffice which I don't usually bother upgrading - also has +IGNOREME). /var/db/pkg{112}# ls