On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:15:18 +0300
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it should be fixed in 2.2.5 version.
Yes, it certainly seems so. It may be a bit premature without
further testing but it works as I have come to expect portupgrade
to work.
Just after I updated this mor
Randy Pratt wrote:
>
> ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep
> ghostscript-afpl-8.54,1
> ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment
> DELETED:DEPORIGIN:print/ghostscript-afpl
> apsfilter-7.2.8/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep rar-3.70b1_2,1
> apsfilter-7.2.8/+CONTENTS:@comment D
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:25:05 +0300
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy Pratt wrote:
> >> Unfortunately I can't reproduce it.
> >> Can you show an output of the command please: cd
> >> /usr/ports/multimedia/kino; make package-depends-list
> >
> > (doesn't this ignore any entries i
Randy Pratt wrote:
>> Unfortunately I can't reproduce it.
>> Can you show an output of the command please: cd
>> /usr/ports/multimedia/kino; make package-depends-list
>
> (doesn't this ignore any entries in pkgtools.conf? I don't have
> any in this case)
>
[...]
> mplayer-0.99.10_4 /usr/ports/mu
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:51:48 +0300
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> >> # grep mplayer /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/*
> >> /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep mplayer-skins-1.1.2_6
> >> /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment
> >> DEPORIGIN:multimedia/mpla
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>> # grep mplayer /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/*
>> /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep mplayer-skins-1.1.2_6
>> /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:multimedia/mplayer-skins
>> /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep mplayer-0.99.10_4
>> /var
Randy Pratt wrote:
> Before starting, I had no DELETED comments in /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS.
> After following the above steps, I checked for DELETED comments:
>
> ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep
> ghostscript-afpl-8.54,1
> ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment
> DELETE
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:19 +0300
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > Randy Pratt wrote:
> >> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
> >> dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few
> >> cases, portupgrade d
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Randy Pratt wrote:
>> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
>> dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few
>> cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were
>> originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file.
Randy Pratt wrote:
> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
> dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few
> cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were
> originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file. I'll use the "netpbm"
Well, I
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:11:14 -0500
Randy Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade
> handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version.
> In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not restore all
> dependencies that were originally listed in
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:11:14 -0500
Randy Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade
> handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version.
> In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not restore all
> dependencies that were originally listed in
I have observed this behavior also, and agree that portupgrade seems
to have a bug.
On 20-Jan-2007 I installed 6.2-RELEASE on an empty hard disk partition
with ports skeletons. Using make under /usr/ports I built some 340
ports over a 2 day span.
Six days later I cvsup'd the latest ports skeleto
There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few
cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were
originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file. I'll use the "netpbm"
as an example:
Before updating netp
14 matches
Mail list logo
