On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:22:08PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>>Hello all,
> >>>I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group
> >>>-- could push to make t
Gary Kline writes:
> >I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a
> > group -- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo
> > packaged versions because frankly I don't want a system to assume
> > that I want to compile the 1.5 jdk / jre from scratch by first
> > in
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group --
> could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions
> because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group
-- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged
versions because frankly I don't want a sy
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group --
could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions
because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group --
> could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions
> because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile
Hello all,
I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group --
could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions
because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile
the 1.5 jdk / jre from scratch by first installing the linux v1.4.2 of
th