Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-24 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
do I just need to update my sources and build a kernel or do I need to buildworld? I hope it is just a build kernel because I get stuck on merge master after build world, I don't understand the questions it asks Thank you for your help Sam Fourman Jr. ___

RE: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 7:09 AM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:06:40 -05

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-21 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
lding > world/kernel. We'll see what happens. > > The version of lsof I have in ports is 4.79, the final "release" > version (minus any of the versioning suffix letters). > > > -Original Message- > > From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Please do let me know. -Original Message- From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 8:46 PM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to '

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:51:36 -0500 "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to upgrade your system sources. The way the developers have > implemented some locking changes makes it hard for the lsof configure > script to do the right thing. > > Please upgrade to current RELENG_7, a

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
> -Original Message- > From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 8:26 PM > To: Larry Rosenman > Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof

RE: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Do you have a Current 8-Current? What is the date of your sources? -Original Message- From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 8:26 PM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: U

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Kemian Dang
.lerctr.org/~ler > > Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-19 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:34:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > would you mind writing something? I agree, but I'm swamped at $DAYJOB. > Thanks for the idea. Sorry, but I can't. I do not understand those details. And my suggestion to write a note to UPDATING base on the fact that you may get those qu

RE: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
ginal Message- From: Boris Samorodov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:57 PM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:51:36 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > You need to

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:51:36 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > You need to upgrade your system sources. The way the developers have > implemented some locking changes makes it hard for the lsof configure script > to do the right thing. > Please upgrade to current RELENG_7, and all should be fine wi

RE: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:06 AM To: Jeremy Chadwick Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed Hi, Jeremy, Thank you for information, it's my fault ignoring the list information. After checking mails, the maintainer said this proble

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Kemian Dang
iday, April 18, 2008 9:06 AM > To: Jeremy Chadwick > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed > > Hi, Jeremy, > > Thank you for information, it's my fault ignoring the list information. > > After checking ma

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Kemian Dang
Hi, Jeremy, Thank you for information, it's my fault ignoring the list information. After checking mails, the maintainer said this problem would be fixed at 4.79L and my upgrading is from 4.79K to 4.79,1. If version 4.79,1 is higher than 4.79L, I think this should be fixed already. Or should I u

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:34:37PM +0100, Kemian Dang wrote: > Hi, > > I cvsup the port just now and upgrade port using "portupgrade -a", get > an error on lsof, the error point of the output is: > > cc -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE > -DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTAT