2011/3/31 Andriy Gapon :
> on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>> ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple
>> for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and
>> do some cleanup in the ports tree, add the "must have" features
on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple
> for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and
> do some cleanup in the ports tree, add the "must have" features while
> doing that. And only w
2011/3/29 Baptiste Daroussin :
> 2011/3/29 Andriy Gapon :
>> on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for
> API/ABI),
> maybe more.
Th
2011/3/29 Andriy Gapon :
> on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for
API/ABI),
maybe more.
>>>
>>> This could be provided in the manifest. Do
on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for
>>> API/ABI),
>>> maybe more.
>>
>> This could be provided in the manifest. Doing it in the filename sort
>> of
I'm just going to clarify a statement I made earlier on this thread in order
to remove some possible misconceptions. One can only boot 32bit PPC on a
32bit PPC machines and have it work properly. The same applies for 64bit ppc
machines.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> O
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> II. Package signing.
That would be really nice.
>>>
>>> Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust
>>> the sah256 of the packages stored in the database. Then if the package
>>> has the same sha256 as t
2011/3/29 Tim Kientzle :
> II. Package signing.
That would be really nice.
>>>
>>> Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust
>>> the sah256 of the packages stored in the database. Then if the package
>>> has the same sha256 as the one in the repo database i
II. Package signing.
>>>
>>> That would be really nice.
>>
>> Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust
>> the sah256 of the packages stored in the database. Then if the package
>> has the same sha256 as the one in the repo database it is considered
>> trusted.
>>
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
II. Package signing.
That would be really nice.
Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust
the sah256 of the
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 25/03/2011 12:11 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,
>>> it's our turn :)
>>>
>>> Julien L
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/03/2011 12:11 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,
>> it's our turn :)
>>
>> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
>> cont
on 25/03/2011 12:11 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> Hi all,
>
> miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,
> it's our turn :)
>
> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
> contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Developpement site: http://git.etoilebsd.net/pkgng/
FYI, we moved to github[1] in order to have a bug tracker, pull
request and code review.
Also, I recommend to build from the HEAD of the git repository, to not
report fixed compilati
> This can still be discussed but I don't really like the idea that
> users may alter packages an installation/extraction time, that would
> lead to lots of potential buggy installation and report.
> If user aren't happy with the packaging, they can poke the maintainer,
> send PR, patch etc.
The w
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:22:50 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> This can still be discussed but I don't really like the idea that users
> may alter packages an installation/extraction time, that would lead to
> lots of potential buggy installation and report.
That's why list of alterations have t
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi,
Great news!
I'll try to contribute with what I can for this project!
I've mirrored the pkgng Git repo here as well:
- http://git.unix-heaven.org/cgit.cgi/pkgng/
And attached is my first patch :)
Could you please re
2011/3/25 Marcin Wisnicki :
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
>>
>
> Fantastic!
>
> I know it is quite too early but I already have one feature request ;)
> Perhaps it could be added to the TODO a
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
>
Fantastic!
I know it is quite too early but I already have one feature request ;)
Perhaps it could be added to the TODO as a post-1.0 goal.
= Generic extraction
On 03/25/2011 03:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
rewrite of pkg_install.
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
How does it relate
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:47:13 -0700 Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> >> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
>
2011/3/25 Yuri :
> On 03/25/2011 03:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
>> contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
>> rewrite of pkg_install.
>>
>> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
>> > >>> the /var/db/pkg//xxx files even with pkgng and only
>> > >>> use
As far as package managers go, yum, which is used widely, uses SQLite.
--
Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through
understanding.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
wrote:
> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
> > >>> the /var/db/pkg//xxx files even with pkgng and only
> > >>> use the DB as a way to speed up some work (so
> > >>> the DB corruption j
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:54:35AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
> >> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the
> >> file
> >> more sooner than later, so.
> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
> contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
> rewrite of pkg_install.
Fantastic! it has been necessary since a looong time.
> - the register command can analyse elf files when registering a new port
>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
>> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the
>> file
>> more sooner than later, so... maybe just save a copy?
>
> I even can rm -rf / by accident.
> What'
Sorry i have just seen a table for dependencies in pkg_repo.c
"CREATE TABLE deps ("
"origin TEXT,"
"name TEXT,"
"version TEXT,"
"package_id INTEGER REFERENCES packages(id),"
"PRI
on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the file
> more sooner than later, so... maybe just save a copy?
I even can rm -rf / by accident.
What's your solution to this? :)
P.S. one solution would be a subcase of
2011/3/25 Pietro Cerutti :
> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg//xxx
>> >>> files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work
>> >>> (so
>> >>> the DB corruption just requires to run pkg2ng), or are y
On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg//xxx
> >>> files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work
> >>> (so
> >>> the DB corruption just requires to run pkg2ng), or are you lost of the DB
> >>> is
> >>>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
> 15:14:52 +0100):
>
>> 2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
>>>
>>> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
>>> 11:11:11 +0100):
>>>
pkgng is a binary package manager writte
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
15:14:52 +0100):
2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
11:11:11 +0100):
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about s
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
11:11:11 +0100):
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you explained.
features supported are or will be :
- the register command can analyse el
2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
> 11:11:11 +0100):
>
>> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
>
> I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you
> explained.
>
>> features supported are or will be
36 matches
Mail list logo
