Johan Hendriks wrote:
Sorry to hijack!
But how can you set the ports build to use -j2
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes|no ## defaults off
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=X ## defaults to number of cores
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes ## default no
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes ## default no
See Mk/bsd.port.mk for more information.
--
-
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>
> >David O'Brien wrote:
> >> I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one
> >> had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port.
> >By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always witho
>David O'Brien wrote:
>> I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one
>> had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port.
>By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always without the
>-j argument.
Sorry to hijack!
But how can you set the ports buil
David O'Brien wrote:
I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one
had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port.
By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always without the
-j argument.
--
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:06:45PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>> shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8
>>> textproc/ispell is only about 2/8
>> Hi Philip,
>> I'm sorry - I really don't know wh
David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8
textproc/ispell is only about 2/8
Hi Philip,
I'm sorry - I really don't know what this means.
The recent parrallel make functionality pav@ added to MK/bsd.por
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8
> textproc/ispell is only about 2/8
Hi Philip,
I'm sorry - I really don't know what this means.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
free