Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

2016-11-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:12:59PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

2016-11-07 Thread Matthieu Volat
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:59:26 -0300 "Nilton Jose Rizzo" wrote: > Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:12:59 +0100, Matthieu Volat escreveu > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > [...] > > I have one question about a llvm and clang ports.

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

2016-11-07 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:12:59 +0100, Matthieu Volat escreveu > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

2016-11-07 Thread Matthieu Volat
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports