Re: Request for a second "ffmpeg" optionality in packages (much as with ImageMagick)

2018-06-26 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:31:31PM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:08 PM Walter Schwarzenfeld > wrote: > > > > I don't understand why? You set all these options to off.. > > > > There's something to be said here for packages that don't try to be > everything to every

Re: Request for a second "ffmpeg" optionality in packages (much as with ImageMagick)

2018-06-25 Thread Adam Weinberger
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:08 PM Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > I don't understand why? You set all these options to off.. > There's something to be said here for packages that don't try to be everything to everyone. I'd be surprised if OpenCV is a common format for a typical ffmpeg user. It

Re: Request for a second "ffmpeg" optionality in packages (much as with ImageMagick)

2018-06-25 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
corr: You can set all these options off. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Request for a second "ffmpeg" optionality in packages (much as with ImageMagick)

2018-06-25 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
I don't understand why? You set all these options to off.. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Request for a second "ffmpeg" optionality in packages (much as with ImageMagick)

2018-06-25 Thread Karl Denninger
Can I ask for this to be set up with a "stripped" version so it's usable for command-line things without having to build the port individually?  This is specifically interesting for embedded systems devices that aren't AMD64 architecture, where building ports can be an amazingly arduous process. "