Re: Signing Request

2009-09-29 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 FYI, cross-posting to more than one list is discouraged. J. Hellenthal wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:40 -, jhellenthal wrote: > >> >> If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please >> don't. I think a lot of people w

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-24 Thread Steve Bertrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 J. Hellenthal wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:40 -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: >> If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. >> I >> know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably >> do

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread J. Hellenthal
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:40 -, jhellenthal wrote: If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. I know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably do not either. Please use your best judgment. Thank you and best regards. Alrigh

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread J. Hellenthal
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:40 -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: > If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. I > know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably > do > not either. Please use your best judgment. > > Thank you and best regards

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread Peter C. Lai
At the risk of sounding offtopic and political, as participants in IT and the open source community at large, aren't we supposed to hold ourselves to the "higher standard" and promote the use of encrypted email? If we're refusing to read signed messages because we have client-side problems with s

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 23), Robert Noland said: > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:40 -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: > > If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please > > don't. I know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more > > users probably do not either. Please

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread Bill Moran
In response to "J. Hellenthal" : > > If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. What is the purpose of your message? The above statement is self-cancelling. If I go to the trouble to establish a pgp/gpg key, I will sign every single message that I send out. The

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:40 -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. I know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably do not either. Please use your best judg

Re: Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:40 -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: > If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. I > know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably > do > not either. Please use your best judgment. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/pgp

Signing Request

2009-09-23 Thread J. Hellenthal
If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please don't. I know I probably don't have your pgp public key and a lot more users probably do not either. Please use your best judgment. Thank you and best regards. -- J. Hellenthal jhellent...@gmail.com _