Given the port will need to be redone when this new feature is released, I
would like to proceed, with your approval, with the two slave ports as an
interim measure.
This will all be redundant once ruby FLAVORs are in.
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
> On
with Apache (on
>> different servers).
>>
>> I propose to create two new slave ports:
>>
>> * www/rubygem-passenger-nginx
>> * www/rubygem-passenger-passenger
>>
>> To do this, I would like to make a one-line change to the master port:
>>
r with both Nginx and with Apache (on
>>> different servers).
>>>
>>> I propose to create two new slave ports:
>>>
>>> * www/rubygem-passenger-nginx
>>> * www/rubygem-passenger-passenger
>>
>> That should be:
>>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > Sergey,
> >
> > We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache (on
> > different servers).
> >
wrote:
> >
> > Sergey,
> >
> > We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache
> (on different servers).
> >
> > I propose to create two new slave ports:
> >
> > * www/rubygem-passenger-nginx
> > * www/rubygem-passenger-pas
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> Sergey,
>
> We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache (on
> different servers).
>
> I propose to create two new slave ports:
>
> * www/rubygem-passenger-nginx
> * www/
Sergey,
We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache (on
different servers).
I propose to create two new slave ports:
* www/rubygem-passenger-nginx
* www/rubygem-passenger-passenger
To do this, I would like to make a one-line change to the master port:
Index
Fernando Herrero Carrón writes:
> All in all, I don't see much use for a standalone libRmath, but it cannot
> be excluded. The truth being told, I would expect newer scientific software
> coming from python+scipy+numpy rather than from R embedded in C/C++.
Given that 1) the port has been marked b
2016-10-04 4:59 GMT+02:00 Joseph Mingrone :
> After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery
> broke two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been
> marked broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting
> them, but
After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery broke
two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been marked
broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting them, but
didn't get a response.
math/libRmath
I'm not sure how w
ncies.
Is this a good case for slave port ?
Slave ports are not documented in porter handbook and I'm not sure how
they work and when used.
Thanks.
A slave port is a minor modification of the port to support different
functions. E.g. security/ssh-guard has slightly different builds, all fro
Le 14/09/2016 à 21:03, abi a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I want to add to existing port another one for the same program, but
> with different git branch and (possibly) with slightly different
> dependencies. Is this a good case for slave port ?
> Slave ports are not documented in porte
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:03 PM, abi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to add to existing port another one for the same program, but with
> different git branch and (possibly) with slightly different dependencies.
> Is this a good case for slave port ?
> Slave ports are not do
Hello,
I want to add to existing port another one for the same program, but
with different git branch and (possibly) with slightly different
dependencies. Is this a good case for slave port ?
Slave ports are not documented in porter handbook and I'm not sure how
they work and when
My proposal would be that the master port offers the options to link
against: none/ATLAS/openBLAS/netlib and that slave ports follow suit. Does
that sound reasonable?
2016-02-13 14:40 GMT+01:00 Fernando Herrero Carrón :
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on some upgrades to the Makefile of mat
Hi all,
I am working on some upgrades to the Makefile of math/R and I have found
that there are two slave ports depending on it: math/libR and
math/libRmath. Now I have some questions about how slave ports should be
handled.
As it stands, the master port will only set some options *if* it is the
.@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:19 AM
To: Cory Dohm
Cc: FreeBSD Ports
Subject: Re: Updating Master/Slave Ports
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Cory Dohm wrote:
> I'm trying to update the port pair net/libtorrent-rasterbar and
> net/libtorrent-rasterbar-python (slave port o
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Cory Dohm wrote:
> I'm trying to update the port pair net/libtorrent-rasterbar and
> net/libtorrent-rasterbar-python (slave port of net/libtorrent-rasterbar)
> from 0.16.17 to 1.0.2 because that is the latest stable release. I've never
> updated a port before, but
I'm trying to update the port pair net/libtorrent-rasterbar and
net/libtorrent-rasterbar-python (slave port of net/libtorrent-rasterbar)
from 0.16.17 to 1.0.2 because that is the latest stable release. I've never
updated a port before, but found this tutorial
(http://www.unix-experience.fr/2013/con
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:33:14 -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:10:26 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > On 11/21/2011 15:17, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > > Lets suppose you want the gtk2 version of lazarus, and lets further
> > > suppose that
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:10:26 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 15:17, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Lets suppose you want the gtk2 version of lazarus, and lets further
> > suppose that the two slave ports discussed previously have been created.
> >
> > You woul
On 11/21/2011 15:17, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Lets suppose you want the gtk2 version of lazarus, and lets further
> suppose that the two slave ports discussed previously have been created.
>
> You would write dependency lines in the port Makefile eg. like this:
>
> BUILD_DEPEN
t; of which toolkit option was chosen when building Double
>> > Commander. Unless there is some sort of detectable filename
>> > change in lazarus depending on the toolkit, you can't tell the
>> > difference.
> This part I don't know i
his is an approved practice or not.
So everything comes down to using the first method you mention; create
lazarus-qt and lazarus-gtk2 slave ports and select the right one with
an options setting from my port.
> This works, but has an important deficiency:
>
>* If the user alre
> port) using the != assignment, but it is discouraged. So I need to do it
> some other way.
>
> Are slave ports suited for this (getting a chosen option from some
> other port)? or is there some other way to solve this?
The way you'ld use slave ports for this is to create lazar
> There are some ports under net-p2p that have qt and gtk slave ports. A
> couple others I can think of off the top of my head are apache22 and
> php5. Those areas should be good starting places to look over to give
> you an idea of how to do it.
Sorry for not answering sooner
oint me to the right manual pages or some other port
which can serve as an example?
Thanks in advance.
There are some ports under net-p2p that have qt and gtk slave ports. A
couple others I can think of off the top of my head are apache22 and
php5. Those areas should be good starting plac
Hello,
I am in the process of making a new port of some application, but I
have a problem with dependencies. The building process of this port
depends in some other port. The problem is they must be built with the
same options (GTK2 or QT in this case).
I have been told the answer for this may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.10.2011 19:52, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
> On 31/10/2011 17:39, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Apparently if you define something in make.conf that slave ports
>> also define, then a generated INDEX becomes useless...
>>
>> http:
On 31/10/2011 17:39, Chris Rees wrote:
> Apparently if you define something in make.conf that slave ports also
> define, then a generated INDEX becomes useless...
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162088
>
> Basically, jpeg2ps-a4 -slave port of-> jpeg2ps
Hey all,
Apparently if you define something in make.conf that slave ports also
define, then a generated INDEX becomes useless...
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162088
Basically, jpeg2ps-a4 -slave port of-> jpeg2ps-letter which defines
A4=yes, and turns jpeg2ps into jpeg2ps
Hi dinoex.
I revamped graphics/xv, graphics/xv-m17n and japanese/xv ports.
I did separate these ports, and add CONFLICTS. In current case,
xv was compiled twice. And I confirmed MAKE_JOBS_SAFE.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
32 matches
Mail list logo
