Re: Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:53:03 -0600 Josh Paetzel wrote: > I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's > not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is > what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as > part of the same pr? Obvious

Re: Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

Josh Paetzel schrieb: I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as part of the same pr? Obviously the one can't be committed without th

Re: Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:53:03AM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's > not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is > what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as > part of the same pr? O

Re: Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's > not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is > what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as > part of the same pr? Obviously the one can

Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as part of the same pr? Obviously the one can't be committed without the other. -- Thanks,