I had heard, perhaps incorrectly, that "TeXLive" had been ported to
FreeBSD. I have searched the ports but without success in locating it.
Is it under some other name or has it in fact not been ported yet?
--
Carmel ✌
carmel...@hotmail.com
_
Hi!
There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD
[1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far.
Since I really think TeXLive can be a plus for FreeBSD, and because I
use TeXLive on another system, I started another effort to bring it to
the ports tree. In
===>>> All >> tex-dvipsk-5.992_3 >> texlive-texmf-20120701_4 >>
print/texlive-base (5/16)
===> Installing for texlive-base-20140525
===> Registering installation for texlive-base-20140525 as automatic
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
mk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/08/2014 11:14, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> ===>>> All >> tex-dvipsk-5.992_3 >> texlive-texmf-20120701_4 >>
> print/texlive-base (5/16)
>
> ===> Installing for texlive-base-20140525 ===> Register
Hello,
First, I am sorry for my being lazy and not responding to problem
reports on teTeX/TeXLive ports in a timely manner. I just updated
TeXLive ports to 2014 and trying to figure out what problems we still
have now. Please report your trouble to freebsd-tex@ list or file a
PR.
I think
Hi!
I try to update ports on FreeBSD 10.0 RELELEASE and it stopped at:
===> Registering installation for texlive-base-20140525 as automatic
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-config/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/te
Hi!
I try to install libreoffice and it pulls also texlive-texmf which size
is about 2 GB and I have a slow Internet. After was done, please read
bellow.
=> Fetching all distfiles required by texlive-texmf-20150523_4 for
building ===> Extracting for texlive-texmf-20150523_4
=> SHA256
I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
for teTex.
I'm off to the FSAE Germany competition for a week, but afterwards
I just have to make a couple of TB runs to weed out missing build
dependencies and I can open the PR.
Because a lot of things depend on a wo
TeXLive ports are available from external source:
https://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:20:24 +0200
Grzegorz Blach articulated:
> TeXLive ports are available from external source:
> https://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/
So, it is not really a port, per se, but rather a CD ISO I can
download for instance. I would have rather thought with the popular
Hi,
You can also try this one: http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/TeXLive-2011/
--
olivier
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:26:18PM -0400, Carmel wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:20:24 +0200
> Grzegorz Blach articulated:
>
> > TeXLive ports are available from external source:
> > https://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/
>
> So, it is not really a port, per se
Hey guys, I did
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portshaker-config install
# Ensure TEXLIVE is checked
portshaker -v
Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under
/usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is
there some grand texlive-build-all port that is
Similar question. I tried to install the texlive-xetex. The installation is
successful, but there is no .fmt files installed.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <
step...@missouri.edu> wrote:
> Hey guys, I did
>
>
> make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/**portsha
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under
> /usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is
> there some grand texlive-build-all port that is in this long list somewhere?
> I updated this page:
> http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/wiki/Installing
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
>
> You should at least install texlive-scheme-minimal but if you don't k
On 10/10/2011 03:29 AM, Romain Tartière wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under
/usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is
there some grand texlive-build-all port that
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't make it
into the mainstream ports. What you need
On 10/10/2011 07:23 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn'
On 10/10/11 07:23, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't m
th Eitan.
I would also be pleased to see TeXLive in the FreeBSD ports (obviously).
There are a few issues to sort out before however:
- The way TeXLive sources are distributed is not convenient: all
binaries are built and installed from a single sources tarball.
This leads to the "big
work with you on that.
>>
>> I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't make it
>> into the mainstream ports.
>
> Also, someone might object that it introduces 2000 ports into the print
> category. But as a counterargument, www and devel
itted to the mainline ports
ro> > > tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
ro> >
ro> > I agree with Eitan.
ro>
ro> I would also be pleased to see TeXLive in the FreeBSD ports (obviously).
ro> There are a few issues to sort out before however:
ro>
> Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
ro> > > tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
ro> >
ro> > I agree with Eitan.
ro>
ro> I would also be pleased to see TeXLive in the FreeBSD ports (obviously).
ro> There are
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 02:10:12PM +0100, Romain Tartière wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD
> [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far.
>
>
> Since I really think TeXLive can be a plus for FreeBSD, and be
.texlive.mk [1].
> Just FYI, debian seems to have chosen something between #1 and #2:
> ~> grep ^texlive allpackages | wc
> 93 7757736
I will have a look at it!
Thanks!
Romain
References:
1.
http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/source/browse/trunk/print/texlive/bs
Romain Tartière wrote
in <20081224131012.ga8...@blogreen.org>:
ro> Hi!
ro>
ro> There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD
ro> [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far.
ro>
ro>
ro> Since I really think TeXLive can be a pl
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:32:46AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Romain Tartière wrote
> in <20081224131012.ga8...@blogreen.org>:
>
> ro> There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD
> ro> [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so
Romain Tartière wrote:
> Well, I don't think of importing TeXLive into the FreeBSD ports tree as
> a replacement of teTeX (sorry if that was unclear by what I meant by
> "drop-in replacement"). I was just thinking about having both in the
> ports tree, leaving existin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello Romain,
Thank you for the interesting analysis and for renewing the discussion
about TeXLive on FreeBSD.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:10:12 +0100
Romain Tartière wrote:
[...]
> 1. TeXLive should be very modular
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:32:46 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> I have three sort of experimental ports of texlive now; the first is
> a large one, the second is completely-modularized one, and the last
> is a combination of mo
Hi Nikola!
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:26:07PM +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:10:12 +0100
> Romain Tartière wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > 1. TeXLive should be very modular
> >
> > It is then possible to run a version of XeTeX more recent
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Thanks for throughout message about possibilities of
porting TexLive to FreeBSD. This work is highly
appeciated!
Personally, I think we should stick with #2 of your plan,
as going with #3 will bring too many ports (thousands?)
ports in our tree
Hi
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:06:18PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Thanks for throughout message about possibilities of
> porting TexLive to FreeBSD. This work is highly
> appeciated!
Thanks
> Personally, I think we should stick with #2 of your plan,
> as going with #3 will
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:06:04 +0900 (JST), Hiroki Sato stated:
> I think it is safe to upgrade a system with TL2012.
> Incompatibilities of TeX engines are quite small though some of very
> old macros were removed in TL2014. At this moment, TeXLive-specific
> management tools such as
Thank for your work, Hiroki!
What do you think about options in texlive-texmf? I'm using a small
part of texlive-texmf, I don't use e.g. bibtex (I write only small
documents, exams), chinese, arabic fonts, etc. - so I don't need these
files.
Other thing: the source files are ne
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, the wise Ajtim wrote:
Hi!
I try to update ports on FreeBSD 10.0 RELELEASE and it stopped at:
===> Registering installation for texlive-base-20140525 as automatic
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-config/l
I've removed texlive-texmf before building texlive-base and worked fine.
2014-08-23 11:49 GMT+02:00 Ajtim :
> Hi!
>
> I try to update ports on FreeBSD 10.0 RELELEASE and it stopped at:
>
> ===> Registering installation for texlive-base-20140525 as automatic
> mktexlsr:
Am Sat, 23 Aug 2014 05:49:02 -0400
schrieb Ajtim :
> Hi!
>
> I try to update ports on FreeBSD 10.0 RELELEASE and it stopped at:
>
> ===> Registering installation for texlive-base-20140525 as automatic
> mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
> mktexlsr: U
Hello Hiroki-san,
I think it would be a good idea to add
CONFLICTS_BUILD=texlive-texmf-201[23]*
to texlive-base Makefile. It appears several people would appreciate this clue!
Do you agree?
Chris
On 23 Aug 2014, at 11:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> Am Sat, 23 Aug 2014 05:49:02 -0
Chris Rees wrote
in <650e7086-e6d4-4503-865d-bc5aad3b7...@bayofrum.net>:
cr> Hello Hiroki-san,
cr>
cr> I think it would be a good idea to add
cr>
cr> CONFLICTS_BUILD=texlive-texmf-201[23]*
cr>
cr> to texlive-base Makefile. It appears several people would appreciate
After the TeXLive 2014 update a number of the tex related ports won't
build. An example is print/tex-aleph. It currently dies like this:
Transcript written on lamed.log.
fmtutil:
/usr/ports/print/tex-aleph/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf-var/web2c/aleph/lamed.fmt
installed.
/bin/rm -f
Greg Lewis wrote
in <20140823174220.ga46...@misty.eyesbeyond.com>:
gl> After the TeXLive 2014 update a number of the tex related ports won't
gl> build. An example is print/tex-aleph. It currently dies like this:
gl>
gl> Transcript written on lamed.log.
gl> fmtu
Hi!
> gl> Error: 'share/texmf-var/web2c/euptex/uplatex.fmt' is referring to
> /usr/ports/japanese/tex-ptex/work/stage
> gl>
> gl> In this case the .fmt files are a needed file for things to work.
> This is reproducible and has also been filed as PR 192933. I am
> wondering if I should fix thi
Hi everyone!
In my current installation of TeXlive (texlive-base-20140525_3) there
is no command etex. This is a problem, as some packages and programs
rely on etex (e.g. metapost).
I am not sure which port to install to have an etex program again.
Also I just noticed fmtutil-sys --all does
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 19:01:15 -0500
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I try to install libreoffice and it pulls also
> texlive-texmf which size is about 2 GB and I have a slow
> Internet. After was done, please read bellow.
>
> => Fetching all distfiles required by
> texlive-te
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:50:23 +0300
wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 19:01:15 -0500
> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I try to install libreoffice and it pulls also
> > texlive-texmf which size is about 2 GB and I have a slow
> > Internet. After was done, pleas
Hello,
Ports to replace print/*teTeX* with TeX Live 2012 are ready for
testing. Please note that this is not the final version and
committing the new ones into the ports tree will go in the following
phases:
1. Commit print/texlive-full for full version of TeX Live.
2. Update ports
Hello,
As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
packages is still teTeX.
If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
TEX_DEFAULT= texlive
To do this, almost all of ports
% svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/print/texlive-base
Relative URL: ^/head/print/texlive-base
Repository Root: http://svn.freebsd.org/ports
Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
Revision: 401397
Node Kind: directory
Schedule
Hi,
I've submitted an update request to update texlive-texmf to 2013 (from
2012), see ports/181675 report [1]. What about this? I'm using 2013
and works without problems.
Another question: is it worth to introduce options into port? I've
installed texlive-texmf with size 1,1Gb an
Hi all,
I'm new to this list, but I have been looking into updating the TeX Live ports
to 2020. The current version is 2015, and the TeX ports could use with a little
TLC to bring those up to date.
I have been trying to update the TeX related ports in place, using the current
infrastructure. i
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
for teTex.
...
Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to
have some volunteers in a week.
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/te
Hi all
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have any
answer.
I known that's nothing urgent, but without tex the live is hard ;-)
Regards.
--
Albe
ink, dirty. I have also included a complete logfile of a failed
hr> cj> build for tex-formats.
hr>
hr> Where is the log file?
hr>
hr> What I need to investigate here is a build+install log for
hr> print/texlive-base on your environment. Running texconfig rehash in
hr>
Hello,
Is there a way to install texlive without X11?
My intention is to replace the teTeX port on a headless
server with the newer texlive port. The old teTeX port
worked fine without X11, but the new texlive-base port
seems to require X11, without a way to disable it.
(I do not need xdvi or
Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Am 03.12.2014 um 09:19 schrieb Michael:
>> In my current installation of TeXlive (texlive-base-20140525_3) there
>> is no command etex. [Also an issue with fmtutil-sys]
> Shouldn't all this be solved by installing print/texlive-texmf?
It is alr
Am 03.12.2014 um 09:19 schrieb Michael:
Hi everyone!
In my current installation of TeXlive (texlive-base-20140525_3) there
is no command etex. This is a problem, as some packages and programs
rely on etex (e.g. metapost).
I am not sure which port to install to have an etex program again
Am 03.12.2014 um 11:05 schrieb Michael:
Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 03.12.2014 um 09:19 schrieb Michael:
In my current installation of TeXlive (texlive-base-20140525_3) there
is no command etex. [Also an issue with fmtutil-sys]
Shouldn't all this be solved by installing print/texlive-texmf
Michael wrote
in <547ec79e.2040...@gmail.com>:
mi> Hi everyone!
mi>
mi>
mi> In my current installation of TeXlive (texlive-base-20140525_3) there
mi> is no command etex. This is a problem, as some packages and programs
mi> rely on etex (e.g. metapost).
mi>
mi&g
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Michael wrote
> in <547ec79e.2040...@gmail.com>:
>
> mi> I am not sure which port to install to have an etex program again.
>
> etex was missing and I fixed in r373858. Please try the latest ports
> tree and upgrate print/tex-formats.
>
Thank you for your answer!
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:41:41 +0900 (JST)
To: po...@freebsd.org
Subject: CFT: texlive ports
From: Hiroki Sato
Please try to install print/texlive-full. The total size of the
On ia64 -current I got to:
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/print
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> for D in /usr/local/share/texmf /usr/local/share/texmf-dist
> /usr/local/share/texmf-local /usr/local/share/texmf-var; do if [ -r $D/ls-R
> ]; then /usr/local/bin/mktexlsr $D; fi; done
Only the first dir presents on a clean install
done
li>
li> Only the first dir presents on a clean installed system. So...
Thank you for the report. A new version which fixes this issue can
be found at:
http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
Please try this instead.
-- Hiroki
pgp6Z3BrHErez.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2013 07:10 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
It built successfully. But when I tried to run the command
tlmgr
I got the following error message:
Can't locate TeXLive/TLConf
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote
in <512ed882.2030...@missouri.edu>:
st> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
st> Hash: SHA1
st>
st> On 02/27/2013 07:10 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
st>
st> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
st>
st> It buil
2013/2/28 Hiroki Sato
>
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
>
> Please try this instead.
>
I tried this version and succeeded to install on 9.1R.
But I miss symlinks etex and lualatex in /usr/local/bin,
which was installed by the portshaker vers
Hiroto Kagotani wrote
in :
hi> 2013/2/28 Hiroki Sato
hi>
hi> >
hi> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
hi> >
hi> > Please try this instead.
hi> >
hi>
hi> I tried this version and succeeded to install on 9.1R.
hi>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:44:35 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports
From: Hiroki Sato
http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130301-1.tar.gz
Built fine on ia64 -current.
Built simple latex documents with it, seems fine.
Thank you!
Anton
On 1 March 2013 12:12, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:44:35 +0900 (JST)
> Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports
> From: Hiroki Sato
>
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130301-1.tar.gz
>
> Built fine on i
Maybe off topic to this thread, but... [ reply at bottom]
--- On Wed, 2/27/13, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From: Anton Shterenlikht
Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:41:41 +0900 (JST)
To: po...@freebsd.org
Subject: CFT: texlive ports
From: Hiroki Sato
Jeffrey Bouquet wrote
in <1362459608.22538.yahoomailclas...@web164006.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>:
je> Maybe off topic to this thread, but... [ reply at bottom]
...
je> One of the three recent teTeX ports [that had minor version bumps] would not
je> install without /usr/local/bin/grep being temporarily
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:00:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeffrey Bouquet
Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
One of the three recent teTeX ports [that had minor version bumps]
would not
install without /usr/local/bin/grep being
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 12:32 AM
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:00:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeffrey Bouquet
Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
One of the three recent teTeX ports [that had minor version bumps] would
not
install without /usr
No, sorry... but it was teTex-base... I could probably reproduce it on another
machine
if needed, which also has the same move-grep instances.
Sorry for the webmail formatting of the remainder of this message..
--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Date: Monday, March 4, 2013, 9:07 PM
je>
Can you please report these as grep bugs? We at pgsql@ explained how you
can reproduce, and concluded it's not the fault of pgsql or TeTeX.
This is not an appropriate thread, please desist from hijacking.
Chris
On 5 Mar 2013 12:30, "Jeffrey Bouquet" wrote:
> No, sorry... but it was teTex-base.
On 02/28/13 14:44, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hiroto Kagotani wrote
in :
hi> 2013/2/28 Hiroki Sato
hi>
hi> >
hi> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
hi> >
hi> > Please try this instead.
hi> >
hi>
hi> I tried this version a
On 2013-Mar-21, 10:21, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 02/28/13 14:44, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > Hiroto Kagotani wrote
> >in :
> >
> > hi> 2013/2/28 Hiroki Sato
> > hi>
> > hi> >
> > hi> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD
2013/2/26 Hiroki Sato :
> Hello,
>
> Ports to replace print/*teTeX* with TeX Live 2012 are ready for
> testing. Please note that this is not the final version and
> committing the new ones into the ports tree will go in the following
> phases:
>
> 1. Commit pri
e following
>> phases:
>>
>> 1. Commit print/texlive-full for full version of TeX Live.
>>
>> 2. Update ports which depend on teTeX to make them possible to
>> select teTeX or TeX Live. teTeX by default at this phase. Split
>> TeX Live ports i
;>> committing the new ones into the ports tree will go in the following
>>> phases:
>>>
>>> 1. Commit print/texlive-full for full version of TeX Live.
>>>
>>> 2. Update ports which depend on teTeX to make them possible to
>>> se
Hiroki Sato writes:
> Once it is confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch
> the default value from tetex to texlive at some point.
Thanks a lot for all the work. Is removing tetex a middle or long-term
goal?
___
freebsd
Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
> choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
> packages is still teTeX.
>
> If you want to use TeXLive, please try to u
2013/5/12 Florent Peterschmitt :
> Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
>> choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
>> packages is still teTeX.
Am 11.05.2013 20:36, schrieb Hiroki Sato:
> Hello,
>
> As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
> choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
> packages is still teTeX.
>
> If you want to use TeXLive, please try to u
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
>
> TEX_DEFAULT= texlive
[snip]
> Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is
> confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch the default
> value fro
David Demelier wrote
in :
de> 2013/5/12 Florent Peterschmitt :
de> > Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit :
de> >> Hello,
de> >>
de> >> As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
de> >> choose teTeX or TeXLiv
On 16 May 2013 14:02, "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
>
> Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> > If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
> >
> > TEX_DEFAULT= texlive
> [snip]
> > Please test TeXLive and send your failure r
D=t1asm is hard coded to teTeX and
>> conflicted with bulk print/texlive-base's pkg-plist.
>
> That is a problem for the freetype maintainers.
Fair enough. I'll pass it back to the Forums and notifty the maintainers
in question.
>> * print/texlive-base needs to be more
Matthias Andree wrote
in <51941f70.2060...@gmx.de>:
ma> I have been looking at the texlive-base and -texmf ports, prompted by a
ma> discussion on IRC involving "marino", Niclas Zeising and myself, and I
ma> must say that I am impressed - not to say scared - by the sh
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:16:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> % make
> % make install
...
> pkg-static: Unable to access file
> /usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/stage/usr/local/bin/a2ping: No such file
> or directory
> pkg-static: Unable to access file
> /usr/ports/pr
Am 13.11.15 um 02:55 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:16:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
% make
% make install
...
pkg-static: Unable to access file
/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/stage/usr/local/bin/a2ping: No such file or
directory
pkg-static: Unable to access file
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:08:14AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Am 13.11.15 um 02:55 schrieb Steve Kargl:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:16:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> % make
> >> % make install
> > ...
> >
> >> pkg-static: Unable to acce
% make install
> > > ...
> > >
> > >> pkg-static: Unable to access file
> > >> /usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/stage/usr/local/bin/a2ping: No such
file
> > >> or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file
> > >> /usr/ports/print/
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote:
>>
>> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered
>> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply
>> tried the latter setting with a "Let's see what happens". It wor
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:14:20PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote:
> >>
> >> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered
> >> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply
>
tream binary packages for FreeBSD 12.1+. Or a combination, by adding
a new
TeX flavor perhaps?
Hello, and thanks for your efforts!
We generally initiate things like this through the FreeBSD bugzilla
( https://bugs.freebsd.org ).
You could probably easily get the ball rolling opening a bug for
print/tex
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
> > for teTex.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Because a lot of things depend on a w
Hello,
On 12/08/2012 10:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
...
Here we go:
Are you aware of: http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ ? romain@ has been
working and maintaining those ports for a while and has plan to merge them
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Here we go:
> http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
>
> # mkdir ~/texlive
> # cd ~/texlive
> # fetch
> http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
