Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

I did not add those unless it was from a build process but that doesn't seem likely for this copy of the ports tree. Now that I know that I could get rid of them a few lines of code did it. svn status | awk '{print $2}' | xargs -I {} sudo svn revert "/usr/ports/{}" svn status | awk '{print $2}'

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Hi! > svn status for /usr/ports is showing ? for these files, why is that? They are not known to the svn repo, so either remove the files or do something with them -- did you add them ? Local patches ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

svn status for /usr/ports is showing ? for these files, why is that? How can I fix it? /usr/ports % svn status . ? audio/linuxsampler/files/patch-src_common_Pool.h ? databases/py-pymssql/files/patch-__mssql.pxd ? databases/timescaledb/pkg-message ?

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

looks like there were a few conflicts. I did a svn revert -R /usr/prts && svn update and all seems well now. Thanks for the assistance! On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > URL: https://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head > > Relative URL: ^/head > >

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Hi! > URL: https://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root: https://svn.freebsd.org/ports > Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 > Revision: 454966 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: feld > Last Changed Rev: 454966 > Last

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

me@me:/usr/ports % svn info . Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: https://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: https://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 454966 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Hi! > I just did a svn update to grab the latest ports but palemoon isn't in the > tree yet. When will this land in the ports tree for CURRENT consumption/ > testing? palemoon is already in the HEAD of the ports tree. Which ports tree did you check out ? What does svn info . say about your

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How about > > a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? > > > > > > Here is a port for the Palemoon browser: > > > >

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Hi! > I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How about > a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? > > > Here is a port for the Palemoon browser: > > https://www.freshports.org/www/palemoon/ And thank you for that! It works much better than firefox in most

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Fri 2017-11-24 12:11:04 UTC+1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey (g...@freebsd.org) wrote: > I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How about > a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? Is using www/firefox-esr an option? ___

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Freddie Cash writes: > On Nov 25, 2017 7:50 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: > > On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:27:47 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: >> On 11/23/2017 20:11, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>> I've just installed the latest version of firefox

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > On Sunday, 26 November 2017 at 14:22:18 +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 20:36:09 -0600, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >>> So give it up, try Pale Moon. >> >> Does Pale Moon address my issues, specifically something to

Fwd: Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Forgot to include the list. Cheers, Freddie -- Forwarded message -- From: "Freddie Cash" <fjwc...@gmail.com> Date: Nov 25, 2017 8:25 PM Subject: Re: Time for a firefox-56 port? To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <g...@freebsd.org> Cc: On Nov 25, 2017 6

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Nov 25, 2017 7:50 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:27:47 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 11/23/2017 20:11, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that >> it breaks both of the addons

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that > it breaks both of the addons that make firefox bearable for me > (firemacs, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firemacs/ > and It's All Text!, >

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Sunday, 26 November 2017 at 14:22:18 +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 20:36:09 -0600, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> So give it up, try Pale Moon. > > Does Pale Moon address my issues, specifically something to match > firemacs and It's all text!? There's nothing

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:27:47 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 11/23/2017 20:11, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that >> it breaks both of the addons that make firefox bearable for me >> (firemacs,

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On 11/23/2017 20:11, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that > it breaks both of the addons that make firefox bearable for me > (firemacs, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firemacs/ > and It's All Text!, >

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 20:36:09 -0600, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Nov 25, 2017 8:15 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: > >> It doesn't address the addon issue. I expect that gradually the >> addons will get updated to the new interfaces, so this is just a >> temporary

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Nov 25, 2017 8:15 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: It doesn't address the addon issue. I expect that gradually the addons will get updated to the new interfaces, so this is just a temporary thing. Oh, no, these addons are permanently dead, and your best hope is to find

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 19:33:18 -0600, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Nov 25, 2017 6:31 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: > >> I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How >> about a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? > > Here is a port for

Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

On Nov 25, 2017 6:31 PM, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: I'm sure I'm not the only person who relies on old addons. How about a firefox-56 port until the current problems die down? Here is a port for the Palemoon browser: https://www.freshports.org/www/palemoon/ -- Zhihao

Time for a firefox-56 port?

I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that it breaks both of the addons that make firefox bearable for me (firemacs, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firemacs/ and It's All Text!, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/its-all-text/). So I can't use