On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:43:06AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:15:48AM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote:
>
>
>On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or
> > extract the +CONTENTS. This w
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:40:57PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Sure. But that doesn't explain why so many +CONTENT files were screwed
> up and why there isn't a easy or easier way to re-generate them.
Sound like pretty standard behavior of softupdates to me. Often files
that were created within
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:19:51AM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:56:51PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > >
: > > [[ as an aside, the updating instructions for xorg should say you m
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Warner Losh wrote:
Best solution is to back up /var/db/pkg if it is in danger of
deletion by a wanton admin :)
The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL* of
the +CONTENTS files going away. It seems to have died during the
updating of the meta-data fo
On 2007-May-31 23:21:15 -0600, Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
>at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
Whilst doing some housekeeping, I've found a pile of +CONTENTS files
in $TMPDIR
RW wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:45:46 -0700 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What you could do with portmaster is to pick a high level leaf
port with a lot of dependencies (something like firefox) and do
'portmaster -aft /usr/ports/www/firefox' (make sure you specify
the directory in /
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:45:46 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you could do with portmaster is to pick a high level leaf port
> with a lot of dependencies (something like firefox) and do
> 'portmaster -aft /usr/ports/www/firefox' (make sure you specify the
> directory in /usr/po
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:19:51AM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:56:51PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > [[ as an aside, the updating instructions for xorg should say you may
> >need to regenerate your config file, since when I used my old one
> >I got pcida
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:56:51PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> [[ as an aside, the updating instructions for xorg should say you may
>need to regenerate your config file, since when I used my old one
>I got pcidata not found ]]
>
Snipped from UPDATING:
If you plan on keeping your
At 1:14 PM -0600 6/1/07, Warner Losh wrote:
The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL*
of the +CONTENTS files going away. It seems to have died during
the updating of the meta-data for the dvdauthor port. Why all
the files of unreleated packages would disappear is a myst
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > I don't see the 't' option listed in the portupgrade -help output.
: > What does it do?
:
: portmaster != portupgrade :)
:
: In portmaster, the -t option means to thoroughly recurse
M. Warner Losh wrote:
I don't see the 't' option listed in the portupgrade -help output.
What does it do?
portmaster != portupgrade :)
In portmaster, the -t option means to thoroughly recurse dependencies
(using all-depends-list instead of the union of build/run-depends-list).
Doug
--
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Warner Losh wrote:
: >> Best solution is to back up /var/db/pkg if it is in danger of deletion
: >> by a wanton admin :)
: >
: > The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL* of
: > the +CONTE
Warner Losh wrote:
Best solution is to back up /var/db/pkg if it is in danger of deletion
by a wanton admin :)
The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL* of
the +CONTENTS files going away. It seems to have died during the
updating of the meta-data for the dvdauthor port.
At 2:06 PM +0300 6/1/07, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Warner Losh wrote:
my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my
battery died at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone.
Is there any hope?
Dodged that lately. Actually in my case most files were dumped
into lost+found
> Best solution is to back up /var/db/pkg if it is in danger of deletion
> by a wanton admin :)
The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL* of
the +CONTENTS files going away. It seems to have died during the
updating of the meta-data for the dvdauthor port. Why all the file
Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Sure. But that doesn't explain why so many +CONTENT files were screwed
> up and why there isn't a easy or easier way to re-generate them.
Portupgrade (at least pkgdb) has functionality to edit the +CONTENTS
file with the aim of fixing the dependencies. So one may understan
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:15:48AM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote:
>
> On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or
> >extract the +CONTENTS. This will work best if you don't have local
> >make.conf customizations, otherwise you
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:12:51AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Not trying to be a smartass here, but wouldn't it be best practice to
> always use the power cord when doing portupgrades on a laptop?
Sure. But that doesn't explain why so many +CONTENT files were screwed
up and why there isn't a
backups people !! :P
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Friday, June 01, 2007 15:22:05 +0200 Thomas Hummel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:07:50PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>
>> Happend to me too (same cause : battery died while portupgrading -a).
>>
> Not trying to be a s
--On Friday, June 01, 2007 15:22:05 +0200 Thomas Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:07:50PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Happend to me too (same cause : battery died while portupgrading -a).
Not trying to be a smartass here, but wouldn't it be best practice to
always
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:15:48AM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or
> extract the +CONTENTS. This will work best if you don't have local
> make.conf customizations, otherwis
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:07:50PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Happend to me too (same cause : battery died while portupgrading -a).
I had nothing in lost+found and since >500 packages got corrupted, no
binary .tgz packages tweaking was an option.
After some search in
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd
Ade Lovett wrote:
>
> On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or
>> extract the +CONTENTS. This will work best if you don't have local
>> make.conf customizations, otherwise you will see variance.
>
> Actually, this do
Warner Losh wrote:
my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
Dodged that lately. Actually in my case most files were dumped into
lost+found so just a lil bit of awk|mv does the job.
--
Sp
On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or
extract the +CONTENTS. This will work best if you don't have local
make.conf customizations, otherwise you will see variance.
Actually, this does bring up a meta-issue that po
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 31 May 2007
> 23:21:15 -0600 (MDT)):
>
> >my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
>
> A laptop in the battery... wow, is the decharging no
Quoting Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 31 May 2007
23:21:15 -0600 (MDT)):
my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
A laptop in the battery... wow, is the decharging now computer optimized? ;-)
at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone.
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:21:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
> at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
I just had a deja-vu. They must be changing something in the Matrix ;-)
http://lists.f
my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
Warner
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
T
30 matches
Mail list logo
