Hi, Kostik,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I did not verified it, but suspect that libldap.so linking line
missed -lfetch. Note, that I mean the libldap.so linking, and not
linking of the utilities depended on libldap.
Looking at the build
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:44:25PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/11 16:30, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:30:03 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in
On 03/29/2011 11:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
No joy. I updated openldap-client to 2.4.25_1 and than tried to rebuild
dirmngr. Same error as I had before:
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `fetchGetURL'
You have to disable the FETCH option. If you're building it in the port
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:57:52 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
On 03/29/2011 11:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
No joy. I updated openldap-client to 2.4.25_1 and than tried to rebuild
dirmngr. Same error as I had before:
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to
This has nothing to do with libksba, it's just a coincidence that
bumping the PORTREVISION on dirmngr for the libksba update caused you to
rebuild dirmngr against an up to date openldap.
Reverting to openldap-client-2.4.24 allows dirmngr to build, thus I've
changed the subject line of this
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:47:49 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
This has nothing to do with libksba, it's just a coincidence that
bumping the PORTREVISION on dirmngr for the libksba update caused you to
rebuild dirmngr against an up to date openldap.
Reverting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what broke the
inclusion of fetch(3) support if I get a bit of time.
It seems that
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what broke the
inclusion of fetch(3) support if I get a bit of time.
It seems that libldif now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what broke the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/11 16:30, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in
On 03/28/2011 16:44, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 16:30, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25.
Am 28.03.2011 um 19:30 schrieb Doug Barton:
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and
14 matches
Mail list logo
