Re: Updating "fetchmail"

Am 03.01.2013 16:46, schrieb Corey Halpin: > On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback. When the 6.x branch is abandoned in favor of >> the 7.x branch, which I tend to believe is not that far off, will you >> then be creating a 7.x port? > > When 7.x becomes the supported release,

Re: Updating "fetchmail"

On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. When the 6.x branch is abandoned in favor of > the 7.x branch, which I tend to believe is not that far off, will you > then be creating a 7.x port? When 7.x becomes the supported release, rather than a pre-release alpha, then mail/fetchmai

Re: Updating "fetchmail"

Am 03.01.2013 16:37, schrieb Jerry: > Thanks for the feedback. When the 6.x branch is abandoned in favor of > the 7.x branch, which I tend to believe is not that far off, will you > then be creating a 7.x port? Whens, ifs and buts... 7.x is not ready for public consumption or production, there is

Re: Updating "fetchmail"

On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0600 Corey Halpin articulated: > On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote: > > "Fetchmail" was recently updated to version: "6.3.24". The port > > version is "6.3.22". The new version fixs some regressions and plug > > the OpenSSL memory leak. > > A patch was submitted to update

Re: Updating "fetchmail"

On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote: > "Fetchmail" was recently updated to version: "6.3.24". The port version > is "6.3.22". The new version fixs some regressions and plug the OpenSSL > memory leak. A patch was submitted to update to 6.3.24 on 01 Jan, which I've not yet had a chance to test and review

Updating "fetchmail"

"Fetchmail" was recently updated to version: "6.3.24". The port version is "6.3.22". The new version fixs some regressions and plug the OpenSSL memory leak. There is also a development version of 7.0.0 alpha available at . I was won