Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-05 Thread Carmel
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:23:09 -0600, @lbutlr stated: >On 04 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Carmel wrote: >> I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably >> easier. I like the separate entries technique simply because I find >> it easier to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. > >I

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. As for packages that require py27-*, I think it's better to leave it to poudriere. Then I think the py27-* package can be cleaned up with the following command. # If you are running poudriere bulk as follows. # poudriere bulk -f ~/pkglist -j name poudriere pkgclean -f ~/pkglist -j name

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread @lbutlr
On 04 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Carmel wrote: > I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably easier. > I like the separate entries technique simply because I find it easier > to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. I agree that separate lines have advantages. When making chan

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Carmel (carmel...@outlook.com): > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=3.7 Forcing python 2 to be python 3.7 will probably break - as far as I can see, there're safeguards in place which will prevent this. In most cases, the python2 dependency is there because upstream hasn't updated their code yet. (Tha

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Pau Amma
On 2020-07-04 16:30, Carmel wrote: What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen 'default_versions" both with and without it. The way I understand it, += appends. Thus: FOO=bar FOO+=quux will result in FOO having the

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > >> "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: [...] > What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly > what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen > 'default_versions" both with and without it. The file is re

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Carmel
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:11:29 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that >> depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to >> update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the >> "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: >

Re: Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that > depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to > update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=

Updating py27-* ports

2020-07-04 Thread Carmel
I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=3.7 DEFAULT_VERSION