On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:10:20PM +, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:25:26 -0800
> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>
> > Anyway, the specific broken port I'm trying to fix at the moment is
> > net/p5-Socket, which is failing thusly:
>
> I had to revert the switch to threaded perl because of
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Now, one last little thing...
The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
instructions as the one dated 20131023,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:25:26 -0800
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Anyway, the specific broken port I'm trying to fix at the moment is
> net/p5-Socket, which is failing thusly:
I had to revert the switch to threaded perl because of this,
dns/p5-Net-DNS, net/p5-IP-Country and converters/p5-Encode-De
On 2013-11-25 08:04, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 25.11.2013 07:53, schrieb olli hauer:
>> On 2013-11-25 07:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Now, one last little thing...
>
> T
Am 25.11.2013 07:53, schrieb olli hauer:
> On 2013-11-25 07:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
>>> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Now, one last little thing...
The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives es
On 2013-11-25 07:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
>> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>> Now, one last little thing...
>>>
>>> The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
>>> instructions as the one d
Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Now, one last little thing...
>>
>> The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
>> instructions as the one dated 20131023, *however* it also contains this:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.11.2013 23:25, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
> On 23/11/2013 22:12, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>> and you will thus need to recompile all ports that depend on Perl.
>> This is the part that is still utterly baffling.
>>
>> Why would _anything_ that is
Am 22.11.2013 12:52, schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> +--On 22 novembre 2013 00:25:26 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> wrote:
> | AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org
>
> Cough, cough, yeah, I mostly wrote that.
>
> | portupgrade -o lang/perl5.16 -f perl-5.14.\*
>
> At that time, that line was right. Now,
In message <845a2e7e540e58efd7f05...@atuin.in.mat.cc>,
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>rfg wrote:
>| Why would _anything_ that is in any way dependent upon the Perl
>| interpreter need to be rebuilt? In this switch to threads=on, has the
>| language itself changed? And if not, shouldn't the change to
+--On 23 novembre 2013 14:12:12 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
|> Perl _was_ set up to be threaded (although I have no idea what is
|> actually threaded there), but the port option to enable it being
|> threaded was not enabled by default.
|
| (One might well ask "why not?" but we will leave
On 23/11/2013 22:12, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> and you will thus need to recompile all ports that depend on Perl.
> This is the part that is still utterly baffling.
>
> Why would _anything_ that is in any way dependent upon the Perl interpreter
> need to be rebuilt? In this switch to threads=
In message
Anton Afanasyev wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote:
>
>>
>> OK, but please help me understand here. What is it, exactly, that is _now_
>> being threaded, that wasn't threaded before?
>> ...
>> (Part of what is confusing about this is that I was und
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> OK, but please help me understand here. What is it, exactly, that is _now_
> being threaded, that wasn't threaded before?
> ...
> (Part of what is confusing about this is that I was under the impression...
> perhaps naive... that P
In message <17d096510a47c61858d55...@atuin.in.mat.cc>,
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>+--On 22 novembre 2013 12:40:07 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> wrote:
>|1) Change the option in lang/perl5.16:
>| make -C /usr/ports/lang/perl5.16 config
>|
>| HUH?? I don't understand this at all. What
+--On 23 novembre 2013 06:13:33 -0500 Ajtim wrote:
| On Saturday 23 November 2013 11:54:27 Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> +--On 22 novembre 2013 12:40:07 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
|> wrote:
|> |1) Change the option in lang/perl5.16:
|> | make -C /usr/ports/lang/perl5.16 config
|> |
|> |
On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Now, one last little thing...
>
> The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
> instructions as the one dated 20131023, *however* it also contains this:
>
>1) Change the option in lang/perl5.16:
>
On Saturday 23 November 2013 11:54:27 Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 22 novembre 2013 12:40:07 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> wrote:
> |1) Change the option in lang/perl5.16:
> | make -C /usr/ports/lang/perl5.16 config
> |
> | HUH?? I don't understand this at all. What exactly is "the
+--On 22 novembre 2013 12:40:07 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
|1) Change the option in lang/perl5.16:
| make -C /usr/ports/lang/perl5.16 config
|
| HUH?? I don't understand this at all. What exactly is "the option" that
| we are changing here? And what does it matter to anythi
In message <0fc91d46cdc4b54132d12...@atuin.in.mat.cc>,
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>+--On 22 novembre 2013 00:25:26 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> wrote:
>| AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org
>
>Cough, cough, yeah, I mostly wrote that.
>
>| portupgrade -o lang/perl5.16 -f perl-5.14.\*
>
>At that time,
I *was* equally setback by this upgrade, but am slowly mostly fixing it on a
build machine to maybe package over to the usual one:
(My quicker pipes have not been working ...)
..
cd /var/db/pkg
gnuls -oSr | grep p5 | head [ increment each time... 10, 20...]
+--On 22 novembre 2013 12:52:26 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| +--On 22 novembre 2013 00:25:26 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
| wrote:
|| pkg_info says that at present I have perl5.14-5.14.4_3 installed. So
|| excuse my french, but why the fuck didn't the command:
||
||portupgrade -o lang/perl5
+--On 22 novembre 2013 00:25:26 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
| AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org
Cough, cough, yeah, I mostly wrote that.
| portupgrade -o lang/perl5.16 -f perl-5.14.\*
At that time, that line was right. Now, after that, the perl packages name
which had the same name (all
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:25:26AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> pkg_info says that at present I have perl5.14-5.14.4_3 installed. So excuse
> my french, but why the fuck didn't the command:
>
>portupgrade -o lang/perl5.16 -f perl-5.14.\*
>
> actually *DO* anything?
Wouldn't the patte
24 matches
Mail list logo