On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:42:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Little time ago I was misleaded by the certain people and got an
idea that VirtualBox actually works on FreeBSD, so I've made a draft
port for it. It doesn't actually work, but since I've spent several
hours hacking it and made
Hi!
Little time ago I was misleaded by the certain people and got an
idea that VirtualBox actually works on FreeBSD, so I've made a draft
port for it. It doesn't actually work, but since I've spent several
hours hacking it and made bunch of (likely) useful patches, here
it is, feel free to use it
Hi again,
this mail was so far a partial success, since we've got into touch with
people capable of helping us with this issue. In the last days the
communication slowed down a bit, but this could be just temporary overload.
The problems for me getting something onto the mailing list should
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Klaus Espenlaub wrote:
Hi,
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Klaus Espenlaub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include disclaimer
I speak for myself and nobody else. I do not claim that I in any way
represent FreeBSD.
freebsd is yet
Hi,
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Klaus Espenlaub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include disclaimer
I speak for myself and nobody else. I do not claim that I in any way
represent FreeBSD.
freebsd is yet another kernel for which the VirtualBox devs would have
to figure
[third attempt - the first two were blocked by the smart freebsd.org
mailserver, which rejected the mail because it couldn't get the name for
the sun mail server's IP address - which looks like a DNS
misconfiguration on freesbd.org. Not nice when trying to send such
messages as the following.]
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Klaus Espenlaub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include disclaimer
I speak for myself and nobody else. I do not claim that I in any way
represent FreeBSD.
freebsd is yet another kernel for which the VirtualBox devs would have
to figure out how to safely
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:04:55AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:48:45PM +0100, Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
I can't compile VirtualBox with your patch (I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0Release).
It works with 6.3, 7.0 has the ULE scheduler which doesn't have sched_lock.
Hi,
New patches, which actually make it compile this time :-)
I can't compile VirtualBox with your patch (I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0Release).
Here are the steps that I've done:
1. Comment CPUTYPE, CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS on my /etc/make.conf
2. Download the VirtualBox source code:
svn co
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:48:45PM +0100, Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
I can't compile VirtualBox with your patch (I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0Release).
It works with 6.3, 7.0 has the ULE scheduler which doesn't have sched_lock.
Rink@ has been trying to get it work on 7.0, but...
rink Mavvie:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
Hi all,
In a post concerning ?porting VirtualBox on FreeBSD?, an Innotek developer
answer that they start to port it, but ?hope some developers from the
FreeBSD community will pick up where we left
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:44:36AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
Hi all,
In a post concerning ?porting VirtualBox on FreeBSD?, an Innotek developer
answer that they start to port it, but ?hope
Hi all,
In a post concerning «porting VirtualBox on FreeBSD», an Innotek developer
answer that they start to port it, but «hope some developers from the
FreeBSD community will pick up where we left off and complete the port».
Original post here: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=3234
Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
Hi all,
In a post concerning «porting VirtualBox on FreeBSD», an Innotek developer
answer that they start to port it, but «hope some developers from the
FreeBSD community will pick up where we left off and complete the port».
Original post here:
14 matches
Mail list logo
