Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
change a distfile location.
It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
change (if any).
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Bob Eager wrote:
> Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> change a distfile location.
>
> It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> change (if any).
Probably nothing-- if someone already has a copy of th
On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote:
>
> Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> change a distfile location.
>
> It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> change (if any).
>
No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave i
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote:
> >
> > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> > change a distfile location.
> >
> > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> > ch
On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is.
>
>Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is
>the only time to bump PORTREVISION.
Anoth