Which to bump for distfile location change?

2011-07-26 Thread Bob Eager
Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to change a distfile location. It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to change (if any). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: Which to bump for distfile location change?

2011-07-26 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Bob Eager wrote: > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). Probably nothing-- if someone already has a copy of th

Re: Which to bump for distfile location change?

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Rees
On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote: > > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). > No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave i

Re: Which to bump for distfile location change?

2011-07-26 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote: > > > > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > > change a distfile location. > > > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > > ch

Re: Which to bump for distfile location change?

2011-07-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. > >Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is >the only time to bump PORTREVISION. Anoth