I wanted to start playing with MovableType and was surprised that
there is no port for it. Of course I'm talking about the Open Source
version.
If this were some obscure bit of software that few people had an
interested in running, I would expect the answer to my question to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
| I wanted to start playing with MovableType and was surprised that there
| is no port for it. Of course I'm talking about the Open Source version.
|
| If this were some obscure bit of software that few people had an
|
On Thu, 22 May 2008 13:01:03 -0500, Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
| I wanted to start playing with MovableType and was surprised that there
| is no port for it. Of course I'm talking about the Open Source
version.
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
| On Thu, 22 May 2008 13:01:03 -0500, Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
| | I was wondering if people have tried and failed to produce port for
| | this, or whether someone is working on it, or whether there is some
| |
On May 22, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Xin LI wrote:
www/MT
Argh! I tried psearch which didn't turn that up, but did turn up some
other MovableType related things that had the mt abbreviation in
their names, so I even tried
ls -d ports/www/*mt*
but, of course, that didn't catch this. It would
On May 22, 2008, at 20:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
www/MT
Interesting.. Wondering why not rename it as www/movabletype? A lot
of people have no idea what 'MT' is and the 'movabletype' will get
hit in search engine a lot faster.
Well, make search key=movabletype finds the port, and it
* Tilman Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-23-2008]:
On May 22, 2008, at 20:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
www/MT
Interesting.. Wondering why not rename it as www/movabletype? A lot of
people have no idea what 'MT' is and the 'movabletype' will get hit in
search engine a lot faster.
Well,
On May 22, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
On May 22, 2008, at 20:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
Interesting.. Wondering why not rename it as www/movabletype? A
lot of people have no idea what 'MT' is and the 'movabletype' will
get hit in search engine a lot faster.
Well, make
