Le 16/10/2017 à 00:31, Mel Pilgrim a écrit :
> On 10/15/2017 11:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +, Yuri wrote:
>>> Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed
>>> here
>>> before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built w
On 10/15/2017 11:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +, Yuri wrote:
Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here
before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with
SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, th
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +, Yuri wrote:
> Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here
> before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with
> SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, this will obviously
> cause conflicts when two
Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here
before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with
SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, this will obviously
cause conflicts when two incompatible openssl libraries will be mapped
into the sa
