Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 20.07.2011 04:45, schrieb Doug Barton: On 07/19/2011 17:04, jsb...@speakeasy.net wrote: Apologies for two subjects. Don't apologize, just don't do it. :) Disheartened by the perl 5.12.3 5.12.4 bump; I've figured how to upgrade (for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 20/07/2011 03:04 jsb...@speakeasy.net said the following: for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines Just in case - have you read its man page and have you ever try to run perl-after-upgrade -f ? -- Andriy Gapon ___

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Andriy Gapon on Wednesday, 20 July 2011: on 20/07/2011 03:04 jsb...@speakeasy.net said the following: for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines Just in case - have you read its man page and have you ever try to run perl-after-upgrade -f ? Well, that explains

a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-19 Thread jsb.__
Apologies for two subjects. 1... After rebuilding ports recently, a ldd recursing of usr/local/bin discovers a whole slew of ports which should have also had their versions minor bumped. Most of those, libgcrypt.so ... although maybe fewer than those found in actuality, though maybe not.

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/19/2011 17:04, jsb...@speakeasy.net wrote: Apologies for two subjects. Don't apologize, just don't do it. :) Disheartened by the perl 5.12.3 5.12.4 bump; I've figured how to upgrade (for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines), but the time to do so seems