And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by operation
with pkg_add and argument -r.
One of ports is security/keepassx. His name is registered in lowercase,
however at installation in/var/db/pkg is registered as KeepAssX. If to try to
install port with
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:52:38 Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/16 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by
operation with pkg_add and argument -r.
One of ports is security/keepassx. His name is registered
