Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

2007-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6 Date:

Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

2007-10-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6 Date:

Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

2007-10-15 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:03PM +, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. Sorry, this should have gone to bin/114200. Note to self: don't trust Subject: lines when hitting reply :) Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[

Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

2007-10-15 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on

Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

2007-07-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6 Date: Mon, 02 J