Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > > > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd > > > expect compiler:openmp to set > > > > > > LIB_DEPENDS+= libomp.so:devel/openmp > > > > > > for

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:59:26 -0300 "Nilton Jose Rizzo" wrote: > Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:12:59 +0100, Matthieu Volat escreveu > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > [...] > > I have one question about a llvm and clang ports.

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > > > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd > > > expect compiler:openmp to set > > > > > > LIB_DEPENDS+= libomp.so:devel/openmp > > > > > > for

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > > clang via compiler:openm

clang support for compiler:openmp

Hi, is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd expect compiler:openmp to set LIB_DEPENDS+= libomp.so:devel/openmp for compiler=clang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a per-port level