Hi
I found this page
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-July/076542.htmlwhile
i searching fix clang compile problem
http://developer.berlios.de/patch/download.php?id=3460 this patch is fix (
Work at least for me :) )
___
freebsd-ports@
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
the only problem I had faced is introduced incompatibility with
clang but that has mostly nothing to do with the port. I filed a bug at
http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&group_id=2663&bug_id=18667
but with no progress though.
I am currently rebuilding all m
Volodymyr, good day.
Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:51:32PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > Ping! Were there any testers of the updated slim port? If yes,
> > please, speak up.
>
> WFM now,
Great, thanks for testing!
> the only problem I had faced is introduced incompa
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Ping! Were there any testers of the updated slim port? If yes,
please, speak up.
WFM now, the only problem I had faced is introduced incompatibility with
clang but that has mostly nothing to do with the port. I filed a bug at
http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=de
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:37:30AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
> > > For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
> > > libpng
> > > >= 1.2.5? It seems t
Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:37:30AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
> > For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
> > libpng
> > >= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist at least from libpng 1.2.5
> > (http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/lib
Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
> For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
> libpng
> >= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist at least from libpng 1.2.5
> (http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng-1.2.5-manual.html) so it's
> safe to use it?
Should be. But accordi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/10/2012 03:01, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
>>> This very error should be fixed by the patch
>>
>> Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully appl
Oh I'm sorry. After grabbing cmake 2.8.7, I found that Xmu is still
detected in find_package(GLUT).
We need a build dependency on cmake 2.8.8..
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Henry Hu wrote:
> I'm testing the patch.
>
> First, I failed to build, and the reason is that my cmake is 2.8.3
> w
I'm testing the patch.
First, I failed to build, and the reason is that my cmake is 2.8.3
which is too old.
According to
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake-commits/2012-February/012056.html,
it seems like that after cmake 2.8.7, find_package(X11) would define
X11_Xmu_LIB, but before that, it is
Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > This very error should be fixed by the patch
>
> Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully applied your patch and forgot to
> move the new patch- file into files/.
Shouldn't it appear in files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> This very error should be fixed by the patch
Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully applied your patch and forgot to
move the new patch- file into files/. Once I fixed the PEBKAC it worked
as expected on
Doug, good day.
Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:48:54AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> /usr/bin/c++ -DNEEDS_BASENAME -DPACKAGE=\"slim\" -DVERSION=\"1.3.4\"
> -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/slim\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\"
> -DUSE_CONSOLEKIT -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe
> -fno-strict-alia
On 07/05/2012 06:09, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
>> slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
>
> I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:09:30PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails to start the desktop, though it has a mix
of old and new packages, so I am rebuilding them just now.
Was a problem wi
Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:09:30PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
> with it, but one fails to start the desktop, though it has a mix
> of old and new packages, so I am rebuilding them just now.
Was a problem with D-BUS an newer Xorg
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
> slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails to start the desktop, th
18 matches
Mail list logo
