On 02/06, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> > Perhaps, this is something for UPDATING?
> >
> > No, UPDATING is for things humans need to do. portmaster should be able
> > to figure this out from MOVED (which is mostly meant for machines).
>
> Of course, I know this about UPDATING.
>
> In this case
st went to update my ports today on a machine, and there was a
> >> conflict between devel/check and devel/libcheck.
> >
> > It's more that libcheck was moved to check.
> >
> > According to /usr/ports/MOVED:
> >
> > devel/libcheck|devel/check|201
2017-02-06 9:18 GMT+01:00 Rainer Hurling <rhur...@gwdg.de>:
> Am 06.02.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I just went to update my ports today on a machine, and there was a
> >> conflict between devel/check and devel/libcheck.
> >
&
Am 06.02.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> Hi!
>
>> I just went to update my ports today on a machine, and there was a
>> conflict between devel/check and devel/libcheck.
>
> It's more that libcheck was moved to check.
>
> According to /usr/ports/MOVED:
>
Hi!
> I just went to update my ports today on a machine, and there was a
> conflict between devel/check and devel/libcheck.
It's more that libcheck was moved to check.
According to /usr/ports/MOVED:
devel/libcheck|devel/check|2017-02-05|Rename to match upstream naming
--
p...@op
I just went to update my ports today on a machine, and there was a
conflict between devel/check and devel/libcheck.
===>>> All >> devel/check (6/7)
===> Installing for check-0.10.0
===> Checking if check already installed
===> Registering installation for c
Hi!
I don't know if the maintainer of devel/libcheck is active, so I forward
this report to po...@freebsd.org, hoping that someone will look into it.
/Martin
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Olsson [mailto:martin.ols...@sentor.se]
Skickat: den 24 april 2013 12:24
Till: 'sunp
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:01:24PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
Hi!
I don't know if the maintainer of devel/libcheck is active, so I forward
this report to po...@freebsd.org, hoping that someone will look into it.
/Martin
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Olsson
/libcompat.a -lrt -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/usr/local/lib
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9/tests'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9'
=== Creating a backup package for old version libcheck-0.9.9
tar: bin/checkmk: Cannot stat
-Wwrite-strings
-Wno-variadic-macros -o .libs/ex_log_output ex_log_output.o
../src/.libs/libcheck.so ../lib/.libs/libcompat.a -lrt -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/usr/local/lib
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9/tests'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel
`/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9/tests'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9'
=== Creating a backup package for old version libcheck-0.9.9
tar: bin/checkmk: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9/tests'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9'
=== Creating a backup package for old version libcheck-0.9.9
tar: bin/checkmk: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: Error exit delayed from
version:
portmaster --no-confirm -dg devel/libcheck
snip
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9/tests'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libcheck/work/check-0.9.9'
=== Creating a backup package for old version libcheck-0.9.9
# No error creating
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:07:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags=-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly
and ccache support, with the official up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libcheck
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/devel/libcheck/Makefile,v 1.7 2008/09/01
00:59:45 linimon Exp $
prefixes: LOCALBASE=usr/local X11BASE=usr/local
NO* env vars: NOPORTDOCS=yes NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes NOPORTDATA=yes
build started
]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libcheck
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/devel/libcheck/Makefile,v 1.7 2008/09/01
00:59:45 linimon Exp $
prefixes: LOCALBASE=usr/local X11BASE=usr/local
NO* env vars: NOPORTDOCS=yes NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes NOPORTDATA=yes
build started
]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libcheck
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/devel/libcheck/Makefile,v 1.7 2008/09/01
00:59:45 linimon Exp $
prefixes: LOCALBASE=usr/local X11BASE=usr/local
NO* env vars: NOPORTDOCS=yes NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes NOPORTDATA=yes
build started
]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libcheck
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/devel/libcheck/Makefile,v 1.7 2008/09/01
00:59:45 linimon Exp $
prefixes: LOCALBASE=usr/local X11BASE=usr/local
NO* env vars: NOPORTDOCS=yes NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes NOPORTDATA=yes
build started
, FORCE_PACKAGE=yes.
Excerpt from http://T64.TecNik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/libcheck-0.9.5_1.log :
building libcheck-0.9.5_1 in directory /var/tinderbox/7-STABLE-FTP
maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libcheck
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports
think we should kill one and change
the dependencies/MOVED files to reflect the merge...
I agree, and I think that we can kill devel/check and preserve the
devel/libcheck that have more CVS history. Or we should think in
reflect the port to project name (In this case, devel/check here) ?
http
BTW, it appears that a duplicate version of this port was added as
devel/check back in Feb. 2007. What's the policy on handling duplicate
ports in the ports tree?
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Synopsis: [UPDATE] devel/libcheck
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mikeh-lippe
Responsible-Changed
the merge...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Synopsis: [UPDATE] devel/libcheck
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mikeh-lippe
Responsible-Changed-By: mikeh
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 29 03:27:30 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why: Felippe, would you like to take ownership of
this port and hence
commit
22 matches
Mail list logo
