Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Dima Panov
Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment. please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries of

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth David Southwell on Tuesday, 04 January 2011: > Can people please stick to plain text. > This is really quite unreadable > > Thanks Agreed. At least mark HTML content as type text/html instead of text/plain. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http:

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread David Southwell
Can people please stick to plain text. This is really quite unreadable Thanks > Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, > build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled > environment. please, don't rely on it in real > environment. correct solution is switch to > bui

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Dima Panov
Hello! 05.01.2011, 02:27, "Kurt Jaeger" : > Hi! > > Dima Panov write: > >>  jh...@dataix.net wrote: >>>  Replace libiodbc with unixODBC >>> >>>  They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. >>  Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, >>  exist in libiodbc

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Dima Panov
Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment.please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system librariesof

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Dima Panov write: > jh...@dataix.net wrote: > > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC > > > > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. > Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, > exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the d

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread David Southwell
> Hello! > > 05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" : > > On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: > >> > >> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- > >> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Dima Panov
Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" : > On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: > >>  Hi >> >>  pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: >> >>  diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- >>  jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so >> >>  Is it right

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread J. Hellenthal
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: > > diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- > jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so > > Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? > >

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: > > diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- > jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so > > Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? Yes. > When attempting to install databases/libod

diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

2011-01-04 Thread David Southwell
Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixO