Hello!
diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a
tinderbox with preinstalled environment.
please, don't rely on it in real environment.
correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6),
which always will use correct system libraries
of
Quoth David Southwell on Tuesday, 04 January 2011:
> Can people please stick to plain text.
> This is really quite unreadable
>
> Thanks
Agreed.
At least mark HTML content as type text/html instead of
text/plain.
--
Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
http:
Can people please stick to plain text.
This is really quite unreadable
Thanks
>
Hello!
diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, > build almost ~1 year old portstree on a
tinderbox with preinstalled > environment.
please, don't rely on it in real > environment.
correct solution is switch to > bui
Hello!
05.01.2011, 02:27, "Kurt Jaeger" :
> Hi!
>
> Dima Panov write:
>
>> jh...@dataix.net wrote:
>>> Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
>>>
>>> They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
>> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
>> exist in libiodbc
Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary,
build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled
environment.please, don't rely on it in real
environment. correct solution is switch to builded
natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system
librariesof
Hi!
Dima Panov write:
> jh...@dataix.net wrote:
> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> >
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
> exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.
Ah, interesting. What's the d
> Hello!
>
> 05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" :
> > On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
> >>
> >> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
> >> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Hello!
05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" :
> On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
>>
>> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
>> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
>>
>> Is it right
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
>
> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
>
> Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
>
>
Hi!
> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
>
> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
>
> Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
Yes.
> When attempting to install databases/libod
Hi
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixO
11 matches
Mail list logo