dns/bind99

2013-05-06 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Shouldn't there be · OPTIONS_DEFINE+= LINKS XML RPZ_NSIP RPZ_NSDNAME RPZRRL_PATCH instead of · OPTIONS_DEFINE+= LINKS XML RPZ_NSIP RPZ_NSDNAME RPZRR_PATCH ? Seems that "L" missed somehow, if I'm not mistaken. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd

Re: dns/bind99

2013-05-06 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +0300, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Shouldn't there be > · > OPTIONS_DEFINE+= LINKS XML RPZ_NSIP RPZ_NSDNAME RPZRRL_PATCH > instead of > · > OPTIONS_DEFINE+= LINKS XML RPZ_NSIP RPZ_NSDNAME RPZRR_PATCH > > ? > > Seems that "L" missed somehow, if I'm not mistaken.

[Bug 198293] dns/bind99: bind UDP dnssec failing

2016-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
, ||m...@freebsd.org Summary|dns/opendnssec: bind UDP|dns/bind99: bind UDP dnssec |dnssec failing |failing Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |org

[Bug 198293] dns/bind99: bind UDP dnssec failing

2016-05-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198293 Tilman Keskinoz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.

suggested patch to /usr/ports/dns/bind99/files/named.in

2015-04-11 Thread Curtis Villamizar
Mat, You are listed as the maintainer of dns/bind99 so this is addressed to you. Sorry to trouble you. A similar patch can be applied to dns/bind910. There would be a line number shift. I tried it - it works. The purpose of this patch is to fix two very minor annoyances. 1. If named.conf

How to build dns/bind99 with EDNS0 off by default

2014-11-06 Thread Daniel Morante
Is it possible to build the dig utility with EDNS0 turned off by default? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: suggested patch to /usr/ports/dns/bind99/files/named.in

2015-04-11 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 11 avril 2015 15:09:14 -0400 Curtis Villamizar wrote: | Mat, | | You are listed as the maintainer of dns/bind99 so this is addressed to | you. Sorry to trouble you. Hi, I'm busy right now, could you open a PR so that I don't loose and forget this ? Regards, -- Math

dns/bind99 and the migration from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x

2014-02-27 Thread David Wolfskill
I am not at all clear how to perform a migration of machines that run authoritative nameservers from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x, given the current setup of the dns/bind99 port. I'm hoping for some clues, if not insight. I have been building & running both stable/9 & stable/10 (on diffe

Re: dns/bind99 and the migration from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x

2014-10-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:27:37PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > I am not at all clear how to perform a migration of machines that > run authoritative nameservers from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x, given the > current setup of the dns/bind99 port. I'm hoping for some clues, > if no

Re: dns/bind99 and the migration from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x

2014-10-19 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, David Wolfskill wrote: After a week (or two), I expect to cut over fully, and perform the process documented near the bottom of portmaster(8) to rebuild/iinstall all installed ports under stable/10. There is a version updated for pkg in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/s