On 21.06.2012 06:54, Michael Scheidell wrote:
you are more then welcome to adopt them.
Is the above REALLY, what API no longer supported means these days?
-mi
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 11:32:59 GMT+00:00
Subject: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol
474, Issue 7)
On 21.06.2012 06:54, Michael Scheidell wrote:
you are more then welcome
: Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com
To: Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 11:32:59 GMT+00:00
Subject: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest,
Vol 474, Issue 7)
On 21.06.2012 06:54
21.06.2012 19:37, Wesley Shields пишет:
The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore.
Quoting the upstream webpage: Take note they [old releases] won't
usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases.
As the port is unmaintained and the version in our tree is not
On 21.06.2012 11:37, Wesley Shields wrote:
The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore.
Quoting the upstream webpage: Take note they [old releases] won't
usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases.
Do we have these recent LLVM and GNUstep releases in the tree
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:27:04PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 21.06.2012 11:37, Wesley Shields wrote:
The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore.
Quoting the upstream webpage: Take note they [old releases] won't
usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases.
Do
