>
> In response to "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> > > > > between their members. When one project member in a posit
In response to "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> > > > between their members. When one project member in a position of
> > > >
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:16:58PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> > > > between their members. When one project member in a position
>
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > >
> > > Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> > > between their members. When one project member in a position of
> > > responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whethe
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:59:49PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On 09/08/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try to imagine the situation if it was reversed. Suppose you were
> > trying to send email about a problem or suggested improvement to
> > someone in the project, but that per
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >
> > Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> > between their members. When one project member in a position of
> > responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whether
> > it was
On 09/08/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try to imagine the situation if it was reversed. Suppose you were
> trying to send email about a problem or suggested improvement to
> someone in the project, but that person bounced your mail with a
> sweeping generalization like "Rejected:
>
> Distributed, worldwide projects like FreeBSD rely on communication
> between their members. When one project member in a position of
> responsibility denies the ability for others to contact him -- whether
> it was his direct choice or just because he chooses to use a mail
> server with inapp
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:59:17PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On 06/08/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How rude :(
>
> Thank you, Kris, for this proof of enlightenment, insight and wisdom.
> Your comments are (and always have been) so incredibly useful, I don't
> find approp
On 06/08/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How rude :(
Thank you, Kris, for this proof of enlightenment, insight and wisdom.
Your comments are (and always have been) so incredibly useful, I don't
find appropriate words to describe my gratitude.
But as I am not a native speaker, I hav
On 06/08/07, Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for respecting mail from Russia.
I do not maintain the rrr.de server. Certainly it is not a very good
idea to filter an entire tld. Sorry for that, I'll talk to our admins.
To the pkg-plist issue,
> Fix it please.
I'll look into
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:58:49AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Thanks for respecting mail from Russia.
>
> Original Message
> X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
> From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
Thanks for respecting mail from Russia.
Original Message
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTEC
13 matches
Mail list logo
