On 09/01/2012 03:48, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ RW wrote on Sat 1.Sep'12 at 0:49:54 +0100 ]
>
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:27:14 -0700
>> Jim Pazarena wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
>>> I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compar
[ RW wrote on Sat 1.Sep'12 at 0:49:54 +0100 ]
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:27:14 -0700
> Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
>
> > Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> > I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
>
> In normal use portsnap should be muc
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:27:14 -0700
Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
In normal use portsnap should be much faster than csup.
The initial "portsnap extract" is much slow
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>> I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
>>
>> and ports-supfile
>> has all the recommended defaults, including "ports-all"
>>
>> what am I missing?
>
> I don't know, maybe something went wro
On 29 August 2012 13:27, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I am concerned, now, because I would have assumed that csup
> actually DOES update me, where it would seem that it has a failing,
> at least WRT japanese/kiten
>
> Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> I will switch to
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
csup is just fine, but you probably did something that confused it. If
you want your speed back, you can
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-29 8:17 AM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
and ports-supfile
has all the recommended defaults, including "ports-all"
what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe something went wrong in the past, but for sure
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
>
> and ports-supfile
> has all the recommended defaults, including "ports-all"
>
> what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe something went wrong in the past, but for sure
that file (at least) is out of date.
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 11:51 PM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
USE_KDE4= kdehier kdelibs kdeprefix automoc4
KDE4_BUILDENV= yes
USE_QT_VER= 4
QT_COMPONENTS= corelib moc_build qmake_build rcc_build uic_buil
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
> USE_KDE4= kdehier kdelibs kdeprefix automoc4
> KDE4_BUILDENV= yes
> USE_QT_VER= 4
> QT_COMPONENTS= corelib moc_build qmake_build rcc_build uic_build
> USE_BZIP2= yes
> MAKE_JOBS_SA
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Can you show the output of `make -C /usr/ports/japanese/kiten -V
USE_BZIP2`, please?
it replies with one word only:
yes
Please, keep kde@ CCed.
Can you paste (http://pastebin.com) /usr/ports/
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 4:05 PM:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
=> kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo.
=> Either /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo is out of date, or
=> kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly.
*** Error code 1
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> => kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo.
> => Either /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo is out of date, or
> => kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly.
> *** Error code 1
Can you show the output of `make -C /u
this is on a fresh install of 8.3, and AFTER running a csup
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 3:16 PM:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
> kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can use OPTIONS to deselect the dependencies. What's
the problem, anyway? Can you paste a log? We're interested
I elected to do a complete re-install of an 8.3 server, and kde4 fails
because of dependencies:
x11/kde4 depends on:
misc/kdeedu4 which depends on:
japanese/kiten WHICH FAILS
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
16 matches
Mail list logo
