Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-24 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:18:00 -0600 Matthew D. Fuller fulle...@over-yonder.net wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:45:01AM +0200 I heard the voice of Ion-Mihai Tetcu, and lo! it spake thus: Since you have the date, you can easily get the git magic string. Not necessarily true at all, in

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-23 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:45:01AM +0200 I heard the voice of Ion-Mihai Tetcu, and lo! it spake thus: Since you have the date, you can easily get the git magic string. Not necessarily true at all, in VCS's that don't limit to single-line history. Consider the case where I'm working on a

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-21 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents? %%% PORTVERSION=0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX} PORTEPOCH= 1 SNAPSUFFIX=

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-21 Thread Anonymous
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org writes: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents? %%% PORTVERSION=0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX}

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-21 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:01:37 +0300, Anonymous wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org writes: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-21 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 15:01 +0300, Anonymous wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org writes: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such

Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-21 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:48:56 -0600, Max Brazhnikov m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:01:37 +0300, Anonymous wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org writes: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be okay if I use commit hash in

git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

2009-02-20 Thread Anonymous
Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents? %%% PORTVERSION=0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX} PORTEPOCH= 1 SNAPSUFFIX= .${SNAPTYPE}.${SNAPREV} SNAPTYPE= git SNAPREV=e09f50e %%% Where PKGNAME would