On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:43:23PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
Hey all,
Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
gmake, gtar etc, but
Hey all,
Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
to the different gstat utility in base.
I'm reluctant to simply rename the coreutils to gnu- prefixes, because
that would upset quite a lot of things!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
Hey all,
Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
to the different gstat utility in base.
I'm reluctant to simply rename the
On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
Hey all,
Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
to the different
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Would anyone yell too much if I _just_ changed gstat to gnustat?
Probably, but you should ignore them. ;)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
