On 27/07/2015 7:36 PM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
On 2015-07-27 11:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm making a port of http://netlib.org/math.
Their license looks like BSD2CLAUSE, but can
somebody please check:
http://netlib.org/math/license.htm
That link should end with .html, not .htm. In any
On 2015-07-27 13:52, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
(Also note that our license framework should probably be scrapped
entirely, because it is ambiguous and undocumented).
Or it could just be made less ambiguous and documented.
Otherwise, we should scrap entirely all other things that are also
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:24:59 +1000 Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org wrote
On 27/07/2015 11:18 PM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
On 2015-07-27 13:52, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
(Also note that our license framework should probably be scrapped
entirely, because it is ambiguous and undocumented).
Or it
On 27/07/2015 11:18 PM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
On 2015-07-27 13:52, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
(Also note that our license framework should probably be scrapped
entirely, because it is ambiguous and undocumented).
Or it could just be made less ambiguous and documented.
Otherwise, we should scrap
On 2015-07-27 11:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm making a port of http://netlib.org/math.
Their license looks like BSD2CLAUSE, but can
somebody please check:
http://netlib.org/math/license.htm
That link should end with .html, not .htm. In any case, the license
seems identical to the
I'm making a port of http://netlib.org/math.
Their license looks like BSD2CLAUSE, but can
somebody please check:
http://netlib.org/math/license.htm
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
