How should I handle this?
The software vendor version numbers go like this:
1.0b3 (older release)
1.0 (current release)
1.0.1 (upcoming release)
The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of
DISTVERSION.
What's a good way to set PORTVERSION (and DISTVERSION, if needed) wh
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 01:25, Mike Brown wrote:
> How should I handle this?
>
> The software vendor version numbers go like this:
> 1.0b3 (older release)
> 1.0 (current release)
> 1.0.1 (upcoming release)
>
> The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of
> DISTVERSION.
On 11/15/06, Mike Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How should I handle this?
The software vendor version numbers go like this:
1.0b3 (older release)
1.0 (current release)
1.0.1 (upcoming release)
The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of
DISTVERSION.
Use PORTEPOCH.
David Symonds wrote:
> Use PORTEPOCH.
Thanks to all who replied.
I had looked right at the relevant section in the handbook and
thought it didn't apply to my situation, but clearly it does :)
Sorry for my confusion.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:25:21PM -0700, Mike Brown wrote:
>
> How should I handle this?
>
> The software vendor version numbers go like this:
> 1.0b3 (older release)
> 1.0 (current release)
> 1.0.1 (upcoming release)
>
> The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of
> D
