I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree:
root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports
URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/branches/RELENG_9_1_0
Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports
Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree:
root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/ Path: . Working Copy
Root Path: /usr/ports URL:
svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/branches/RELENG_9_1_0
From da...@catwhisker.org Fri Feb 8 15:04:41 2013
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:47:05PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree:
=20
root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/
Path: .
Working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/8/13 10:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 14:54:13 2013
On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed
9.1-release including the ports tree: root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn
info /usr/ports/
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
You already have (achieved this): ports is (still) not brnched as src
is. We use the head of the ports tree for all branches of FreeBSD.
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
about NOV-2012. I believe the revision was
also substantially lower.
From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 17:33:07 2013
On 2/8/13 10:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 14:54:13 2013
On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed
9.1-release including the ports
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
about NOV-2012. I believe the revision was
also substantially lower.
On 2/8/13, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
about NOV-2012. I believe the
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the
On 2/8/13, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 21:00:33 2013
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8
13 matches
Mail list logo