Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-05 Thread Doug Barton
Michel Talon wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > >> Robert Huff wrote: >>> Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are >>> standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on >>> installed ports not on the list. >>> Is there a port that will produce a unified and order

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-05 Thread Michel Talon
Doug Barton wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: > > Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are > > standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on > > installed ports not on the list. > > Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > > dependency list, suc

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-05 Thread Doug Barton
Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Robert Huff wrote: >>Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are >> standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on >> installed ports not on the list. >>Is there a port that will produce a unified and

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-05 Thread Doug Barton
Robert Huff wrote: > Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are > standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on > installed ports not on the list. > Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > dependency list, such that upgrading/reinstalling

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-02 Thread Robert Huff
Randy Pratt writes: > >Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > > dependency list, such that upgrading/reinstalling in that order will > > avoid multiple rebuilds? I though portupgrade could to this, but > > apparently not. > > Portupgrade installs several pkg_* tools

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-02 Thread Randy Pratt
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:48:37 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are > standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on > installed ports not on the list. > Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > dependency li

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-01 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > >Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are > standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on > installed ports not on the list. >Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > dependency l

Re: installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-01 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Robert Huff wrote: >Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are > standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on > installed ports not on the list. >Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered > dependency lis

installed ports dependency tree?

2009-02-01 Thread Robert Huff
Suppose I have installed ports A..Z. Some of these are standakone; some depend on others on the list; others depend on installed ports not on the list. Is there a port that will produce a unified and ordered dependency list, such that upgrading/reinstalling in that order will avoi