Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x amd64 8.1-RC2, breaking build of
graphics
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 03:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
I did install Arch Linux on my wifes
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 11:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
It already started
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2010-July/008931.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:13:56 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
Port for k3b-2.0.0 is available
