Am 29. Juni 2017 18:55:59 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard :
>I'm not currently set up to run more than head on
>any of amd64, powerpc64, powerpc, aarch64, or armv6/7
>(which are all I target). And I'm in the middle of
>attempting a fairly large jump to head -r320458 on
>those.
Oh, then I had misu
On 2017-Jun-29, at 3:10 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard dsl-only.net>:
>> A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1
>> and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 .
>
> Thank you, Mark. Let me know
Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard :
>A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1
>and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 .
Thank you, Mark. Let me know how it went. In the meantime I'll prepare the
change for gcc5 itself.
>I
On 2017-Jun-28, at 3:21 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I am testing a patch for gcc5-devel right now that will disable fixincludes
> (or rather its fixed files) being packaged.
>
> Should that work fine for you, I will push this back to gcc5 the following
> days.
>
> That said, the change that t
Hi everyone,
I am testing a patch for gcc5-devel right now that will disable fixincludes (or
rather its fixed files) being packaged.
Should that work fine for you, I will push this back to gcc5 the following days.
That said, the change that triggered this is what I would expect on CURRENT,
not
Top post on one point. . .
Patrick Powell papowell at astart.com wrote on Mon Jun 26 14:10:44 UTC 2017
(He was quoting Gerald. I was also part of some earlier discussions.)
> (Luckily this only hits with most -CURRENT versions of FreeBSD and
> older packages only.)
>
> Gerald
Unfortunately this
I have reported this problem - see email to freebsd-stable
Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition
Here is part of the discussion:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Dimitry Andric wrote:
This is because gcc's fixincludes process makes copies of certain system
headers (i
The following is based mostly on an extraction from a
private exchange in which a question was asked and my
answer was unsettling: incompatibilities within the
11.* family. I would not normally send to re but doing
so was explicitly mentioned. Hopefully this example is
reasonable for doing that.