Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-24 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 20:05:36 -0800 (PST) Thomas Mueller wrote: from Tijl Coosemans: On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:57:12 + (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: Now I want to know what would happen if I rebuild system with WITHOUT_ICONV=yes in /etc/src.conf and use libiconv from ports. Would it work,

libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open If I delete libiconv, then I get: firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Undefined symbol

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open If I delete libiconv, then I get: firefox XPCOMGlueLoad

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:51:34 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Undefined symbol

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From swhet...@gmail.com Sun Feb 23 11:21:05 2014 On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From t...@freebsd.org Sun Feb 23 11:21:17 2014 On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:51:34 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so: Undefined symbol __bsd_iconv_open firefox

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 03:43:58 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From t...@freebsd.org Sun Feb 23 11:21:17 2014 On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:51:34 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: pkg upgrade pulled libiconv. Now I get errors like: # gphoto2 -l /usr/local/lib/libgphoto2/2.5.3.1/ptp2.so:

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:57:12 + (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: From other posts on emailing lists, I see libiconv from ports supports utf-8, while base (=10) does not. No, utf-8 works fine with base iconv. Base iconv does not recognise the special encoding named wchar_t which means whatever

Re: libiconv pulled in by pkg upgrade? lots of errors after that

2014-02-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Tijl Coosemans: On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:57:12 + (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: From other posts on emailing lists, I see libiconv from ports supports utf-8, while base (=10) does not. No, utf-8 works fine with base iconv. Base iconv does not recognise the special encoding