On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
[ snip ]
I'd suggest to let Milan work on the port and tell him the
constraints - for instance, that now staging needs to be addressed
On Mon, 26 May 2014 02:45:45 -0500
Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Milan Obuch
freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
[ snip ]
OK, I already began work on staging, this was
On 25 May 2014, at 21:38, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
pkg-fallout-buil...@freebsd.org sends me every other day mails about
failing mail/courier build for both 10.0 and 11.0 FreeBSD versions.
There is some incompatibility with GCC 4.7, which is used to build
mail/courier on systems
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 02:45:45 -0500
Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Milan Obuch
freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Frankly, courier looses more and more marketshare, as can be seen
On Mon, 26 May 2014 17:23:51 +0200
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 25 May 2014, at 21:38, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
pkg-fallout-buil...@freebsd.org sends me every other day mails about
failing mail/courier build for both 10.0 and 11.0 FreeBSD versions.
There is
On Mon, 26 May 2014 10:30:57 -0500
Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk
wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 02:45:45 -0500
Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Milan Obuch
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Milan Obuch freebsd-po...@dino.sk wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
It does not take much time to revert, for me, at least in this
On Mon, 26 May 2014 17:47:37 +0200
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly
behind the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list
Hi,
pkg-fallout-buil...@freebsd.org sends me every other day mails about
failing mail/courier build for both 10.0 and 11.0 FreeBSD versions.
There is some incompatibility with GCC 4.7, which is used to build
mail/courier on systems with system compiler switched to clang. It
works, however, with
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which addresses
this issue (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is
really simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly],
[REL -
On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:10:08 +0200
Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really
simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really
simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly],
On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is
really simple and should solve package builder failures for
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Frankly, courier looses more and more marketshare, as can be seen on
On Sun, 25 May 2014 23:19:55 +0200
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly
behind the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Am 25.05.2014 23:19, schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Frankly, courier looses more
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
[ snip ]
I'd suggest to let Milan work on the port and tell him the
constraints - for instance, that now staging needs to be addressed
first and then the build-on-10 issue.
OK, I already began work on staging,
18 matches
Mail list logo