- Original Message -
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, RW
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:01:56 +0100
> > Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 June 2012 17:58, RW wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
> >> > Chris Rees wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry"
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:01:56 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> On 29 June 2012 17:58, RW wrote:
>> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
>> > Chris Rees wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > The "multimedia/linux-realpl
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:01:56 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 29 June 2012 17:58, RW wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
> > Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> >> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" f
On 29 June 2012 22:32, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> I have a copy here,
> I am thinking in upload it to a p2p network (torrent)...
> in piratebay, for example
>
> It is not a mirror...
That's fine, but the port should be removed unless Real makes the file
available again. It is not an attrac
I have a copy here,
I am thinking in upload it to a p2p network (torrent)...
in piratebay, for example
It is not a mirror...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mai
On 29 June 2012 17:58, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>> >
>> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
>> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on
>> > a resolution for th
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
> >
> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on
> > a resolution for this problem.
>
> Unless a legal mirror is fo
On Jun 29, 2012 4:49 PM, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/12 11:12 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> > > resolution for this problem.
> > if you have a copy of it, that match
> On 6/29/12 11:12 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> > resolution for this problem.
> if you have a copy of it, that matches SIZE and SHA256, why not host it
> and open a pr to cha
On 6/29/12 11:12 AM, Jerry wrote:
The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
"BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
resolution for this problem.
if you have a copy of it, that matches SIZE and SHA256, why not host it
and open a pr to change the master
Hi!
> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> > resolution for this problem.
>
> Unless a legal mirror is found, I'm afraid we can't provide it; mirroring
> is forbidden.
>
> http://www.real.com/licensin
On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>
> The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> resolution for this problem.
Unless a legal mirror is found, I'm afraid we can't provide it; mirroring
is forbidden.
http:/
The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
"BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
resolution for this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
